435-5649
sk...@us.ibm.com
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
To: general@incubator.apache.org, Mark Struberg
,
Date: 09/17/2013 04:04 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache?
Hi
Scott said me this needs more discussion and
ll have a good amount of
> merrit.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, 16 September 2013, 22:11
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch
al Message -
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 16 September 2013, 22:11
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache?
>
> Hi,
>
> Now Scott informed us we can fork the RI (
> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2013/9/16 Romain Manni-Bucau
> Hi,
>
> Now Scott informed us we can fork the RI (
>
> http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-jbatch-impl-Apache-td36529.html
> )
> is it ok to start to write a proposal?
> Le 30 août 2013 15
Hi,
Now Scott informed us we can fork the RI (
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-jbatch-impl-Apache-td36529.html)
is it ok to start to write a proposal?
Le 30 août 2013 15:23, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a
écrit :
> Hi
>
> added some few modules:
>
Romain emailed me asking for a public response to this thread.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201308.mbox/%3cCACLE=7MxJo4CWFg26wDURnN9mFHsQ9n8ZM624N1YzQxnYey8
+a...@mail.gmail.com%3e
As the IBM development lead for the JSR 352 RI & TCK, I can relay that IBM
has no iss
annibucau*
>> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/8/27 Mark Struberg
>> >
>> > > I'd definitly need a jBatch here for some customers and I'd be happy
>> to
>> > > help with hackin
appy to
> > > help with hacking, testing and even mentoring.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: Alan Cabrera
> > > > To: gener
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: Alan Cabrera
> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: Monday, 26 August 2013, 17:15
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache?
> > >
> > > Is there enough inte
th hacking, testing and even mentoring.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Alan Cabrera
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, 26 August 2013, 17:15
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @A
gt; Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] jbatch impl @Apache?
>
> Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this? Would it
> make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
&
Romain,
I'm interested to work with you on this.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> A bunch of users will be standalone users so a separated project sounds
> fine to me
> Le 26 août 2013 17:15, "Alan Cabrera" a écrit :
>
> > Is there enough interest to generate an acti
A bunch of users will be standalone users so a separated project sounds
fine to me
Le 26 août 2013 17:15, "Alan Cabrera" a écrit :
> Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this? Would
> it make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this? Would it
make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE?
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> As you probably know JavaEE 7 proposes a new spec called JBatch (aka JSR
> 352)
Hi
As you probably know JavaEE 7 proposes a new spec called JBatch (aka JSR
352).
I'd love to see an implementation @Apache.
There is ATM only one implementation (spring-batch doesn't pass the full
TCKs): the RI (done by IBM).
AFAIK they doesn't aim to create a community about this spec but the
15 matches
Mail list logo
