Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

2013-12-01 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi, Apologies for returning to this after one week, but I have been on vacation. I am not against this experiment in general, especially after Bertrand's later clarification. I am against the experiment in VXQuery's case because Till has already been made an IPMC member under the prior

Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

2013-11-23 Thread ant elder
I'm in favour of trying this. And its just experiment remember so not a change for ever for all podlings so please people try to support it or at least not try to block it. ...ant On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: The possibility of an experiment

[PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

2013-11-22 Thread Marvin Humphrey
The possibility of an experiment with making PPMC votes binding on incubating releases under some conditions has been discussed at length in recent threads on general@incubator. I propose that we vote on the following language to run the experiment with VXQuery as a test podling: The

Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

2013-11-22 Thread Dave Fisher
So we vote to make Till an IPMC member and then we have a proposal to allow VXQuery to have a non-Apache Member cast the only IPMC binding VOTE on a release. Sorry, but that is one step too many. Here is my proposal - see if invoking the old experiment (making a pdling PPMC member into an IPMC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Experiment: VXQuery PPMC Release Voting

2013-11-22 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: So we vote to make Till an IPMC member and then we have a proposal to allow VXQuery to have a non-Apache Member cast the only IPMC binding VOTE on a release. If VXQuery can't be trusted, why do you support graduation[1]?