Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-17 Thread Henry Saputra
Chris, could you please address my concern about user@ list - Henry On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Chris Aniszczyk caniszc...@gmail.com wrote: SGTM Roman, thanks for volunteering! I'll start the vote on Sunday barring any issues. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Roman Shaposhnik

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-17 Thread Chris Aniszczyk
Your request about the user list seems fine, no need to have multiple lists atm IMHO. The proposal has been updated accordingly, thanks! https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal?action=recallrev=21 On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote: Chris,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-17 Thread Henry Saputra
Cool, thanks! Looking forward for the VOTE thread :) On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Chris Aniszczyk caniszc...@gmail.com wrote: Your request about the user list seems fine, no need to have multiple lists atm IMHO. The proposal has been updated accordingly, thanks!

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-16 Thread Henry Saputra
Like most new projects coming to incubator I always check on how busy is the existing user@ list in Parquet right now? If most questions or concerns are related to development, I would suggest to remove request for user@ list for now to get the project focus on moving to ASF development

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-16 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! proposal looks good to me and I am very much looking for a voting thread. One small request, since I plan to spend a fair amount of time on Parquet anyway, would you guys be ok with adding me as an extra mentor so I can help with that aspect of the project as well? Thanks, Roman. P.S. Plus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-16 Thread Chris Aniszczyk
SGTM Roman, thanks for volunteering! I'll start the vote on Sunday barring any issues. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! proposal looks good to me and I am very much looking for a voting thread. One small request, since I plan to spend a fair

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-16 Thread Dmitriy Ryaboy
Roman -- you've been added, thanks for volunteering :) One Jake's repo question, I think it would be somewhat problematic, and we'd prefer multiple git repos. Format and the java code are currently versioned separately and have different builds (format is much lighter). Plus, if we add, for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-16 Thread Jake Farrell
Thanks Dmitriy Thats what I thought we would do but just wanted to make sure, proposal updated to reflect the main imports that we will need -Jake On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@gmail.com wrote: Roman -- you've been added, thanks for volunteering :) One Jake's repo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-15 Thread Todd Lipcon
Proposal looks good to me! Eagerly awaiting the vote. -Todd On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Chris Aniszczyk caniszc...@gmail.comwrote: We would like to propose Parquet as an Apache Incubator project. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal Feel free to comment, we'll go for a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-15 Thread Jake Farrell
Changed some of the mailing lists requested to match the format currently in use. One question I had was do we plan to merge parquet-mr and parquet-format into one parquet repo as listed in the proposal or keep them separated? Other than that looks good -Jake On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:02 PM,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-14 Thread Mark Struberg
Sounds good to me. I'm not into Hadoop, but sounds like it's useful. The code seems to be ALv2 since quite some time thus I don't see much legal issues in this respect. LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 13 May 2014, 6:09, Chris Aniszczyk caniszc...@gmail.com wrote: We would like to propose Parquet

[PROPOSAL] Parquet

2014-05-12 Thread Chris Aniszczyk
We would like to propose Parquet as an Apache Incubator project. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal Feel free to comment, we'll go for a vote in a week or two or whenever consensus has been reached on the proposal. I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: == Abstract ==