Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-15 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 9/14/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of interest, what would this tool specifically check for? there are a number of mechanical checks that i perform. they are slow to perform manually. i can't scale. so i've made a start on automating them. it's a work in progress.

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-15 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 9/14/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just curious: what kind of issues does it track down? whatever issues it's coded to track down ;-) it's a work in progress. it turned up the potential issues with source document in the last servicemix candidate. - robert

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-15 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 9/14/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a basic tool that i've been running against the source releases recently. it's simple but helps to track down some basic issues. no documentation. would this tool be useful for podlings (mentors and release managers in

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-15 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I would suggest it go into: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/ as it would be applicable for non-incubator projects as well. Unless there's something special, how about a public tree? A podling it's own right? -- Jeremy

Re: Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-15 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 9/15/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I would suggest it go into: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/ as it would be applicable for non-incubator projects as well. Unless there's something special, how about a

[RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-14 Thread robert burrell donkin
i have a basic tool that i've been running against the source releases recently. it's simple but helps to track down some basic issues. no documentation. would this tool be useful for podlings (mentors and release managers in particular)? if so, would it be appropriate to check the source in

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-14 Thread Martin Cooper
On 9/14/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a basic tool that i've been running against the source releases recently. it's simple but helps to track down some basic issues. no documentation. would this tool be useful for podlings (mentors and release managers in

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-14 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Just curious: what kind of issues does it track down? Eelco On 9/14/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a basic tool that i've been running against the source releases recently. it's simple but helps to track down some basic issues. no documentation. would this tool be

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-14 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Just out of interest, what would this tool specifically check for? In what does it differ from checkstyle, pmd and findbugs? Will it work with Java/C/C++/Python sources? Best regards, Martijn On 9/14/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a basic tool that i've been

Re: [RELEASES] any interest in a source audit tool?

2006-09-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thursday September 14 2006 5:31 pm, robert burrell donkin wrote: i have a basic tool that i've been running against the source releases recently. it's simple but helps to track down some basic issues. no documentation. would this tool be useful for podlings (mentors and release managers