Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I don’t really know the answer to that. Ralph > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > >> Yes, please go ahead. > > What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub? Should it be > deactivated/delet

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > Yes, please go ahead. What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub? Should it be deactivated/deleted? 2 of the 3 PRs there have already been applied in the past and I asked the author of the most current third one to p

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Yes, please go ahead. Ralph > On Apr 9, 2017, at 3:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Ralph, > > It looks like most everything is done. If you don't get to it, I'll update > the podlings.xml and content/projects/log4cxx2.xml file to reflect graduation > status. > > John > > On Fri, Apr 7, 20

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Ralph, It looks like most everything is done. If you don't get to it, I'll update the podlings.xml and content/projects/log4cxx2.xml file to reflect graduation status. John On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:10 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks for the info Greg! > > Ralph > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Thanks for the info Greg! Ralph > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning > wrote: > >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I wil

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I will just create > > a Jira issue for infra and find out. > > From my understanding, a logging PMC needs to create the GIT r

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017 um 07:10 schrieben Sie: > No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move > to git or not "We" want, as nobody objected in the discussion and Matts description of how to deal with GitHub PRs sounds very promising. > and I am

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I figured out how to see the issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13651 . It seems it is in a status of waiting for user but the reporter has no way to kick it back to infra. It has been sitting there for over a week. Ralph >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move to git or not and I am not quite sure what the process is to move from svn to git without losing history. I guess I will just create a Jira issue for infra and find out. Also we have an outstanding infra request to combine all t

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Ralph, Have you completed the process? I see log4cxx is still listed as active in the incubator records. John On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:45 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and > no other votes. So we will begin the process of moving

[RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and no other votes. So we will begin the process of moving the project back to Logging Services. Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2