We had two additional votes...
Now we have 5 binding +1s, one 0s and one -1s.
Votes were cast by:
Ant Elder (+1)
Matthieu Riou (+1)
Jean Anderson (+1)
Martijn Dashorst (+1)
Paul Fremantle (+1)
Bertrand Delacretaz(+0)
Kevan Millar (-1)
Thanks again for your support!
-- Michael Baessler
Paul
I know I'm late but I'd like to add a +1 to the vote.
Paul
On Dec 19, 2007 10:02 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2007 10:52 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> ...We have 4 binding +1s, no 0s and 1 -1s
> >>
> >
>
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 10:52 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...We have 4 binding +1s, no 0s and 1 -1s
I did vote +0 earlier in this thread. Just for the record, as it
doesn'n make much of a difference other than express support ;-)
Sorry I m
On Dec 19, 2007 10:52 AM, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...We have 4 binding +1s, no 0s and 1 -1s
I did vote +0 earlier in this thread. Just for the record, as it
doesn'n make much of a difference other than express support ;-)
-Bertrand
--
This vote has been open for more than a 72 hours.
We have 4 binding +1s, no 0s and 1 -1s.
Votes were cast by:
Ant Elder (+1)
Matthieu Riou (+1)
Jean Anderson (+1)
Martijn Dashorst (+1)
Kevan Millar (-1)
We will modify the checksum representation for MD5 and SHA1 so that tools can
easier
