17 at 11:59 AM, > incubator.apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> From: Justin Mclean
> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> Cc:
> >> Bcc:
> >> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:19:46 +1000
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Approve the rel
e process.
> Lewis
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:59 AM, incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Justin Mclean
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:19:46 +1000
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Approve the relea
release process.
> Lewis
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:59 AM, <
> general-digest-h...@incubator.apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Justin Mclean
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12
1000
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1
> (rc4)
> Hi,
>
> > @justin, if you are interested in continuing to help Joshua incubating
> with
> > the release process then pleae stick with us until we iron this one out.
>
> I’
Here's my +1 for the release.
We may have to be a bit diligent on an issue like this, but can be resolved
after this release.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:20 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > @justin, if you are interested in continuing to help Joshua incubating
> with
> > the release process th
Hi,
> @justin, if you are interested in continuing to help Joshua incubating with
> the release process then pleae stick with us until we iron this one out.
I’ve already voted +1 on the release.
That GitHub issue looks resolved to me i.e. the copyright owner gave you
permission to use the code
Hi Folks,
We are making progress here folks.
@justin, if you are interested in continuing to help Joshua incubating with
the release process then pleae stick with us until we iron this one out.
Thank you
Lewis
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 2:28 PM, lewis john mcgibbney
wrote:
> Please see the following
ustin Mclean
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:29:14 +1000
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1
>> (rc4)
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wondering if the "All rights reserv
so been added.
> Lewis
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:59 AM,
> wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Justin Mclean
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:29:14 +1000
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of
Hi,
Not to be a pain but I still don't think that quite explains the "All rights
reserved” comment.
Just because these files were added to a repo that is under an Apache license
(by someone other than the author I would note) doesn't automatically mean the
original files were Apache licensed.
ee12805426fc5ac61b3fdb702a5a059404d64f
> The copyright has been retained but the Apache Licence v2.0 header has also
> been added.
> Lewis
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:59 AM,
> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Justin Mclean
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
M,
wrote:
>
> From: Justin Mclean
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:29:14 +1000
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1
> (rc4)
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if the "All rights reserved” may
Hi,
Just wondering if the "All rights reserved” may imply that it's not licensed
under a permissive license?
I’m unaware of the history / providence of that file so was enquiring if
anyone on the project had any more info where it come from.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> The mentioned files should come from [1.2], which contains AL2 header.
Sure I can see that but where did the files original come from and how where
they originally licensed?
For instance I can see the same(?) file here without an ASF header [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://github.com/redpo
thanks Justin for your vote.
The mentioned files should come from [1.2], which contains AL2 header.
When building Joshua you may found the compiled binaries, but they are not
shipped together with the source release; so if I understand things
correctly we should be fine.
Regards,
Tommaso
[1] :
h
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name includes incubating
- signatures and hashes correct
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE is OK
- NOTICE contains wrong year please fix
- no unexpected binary files
- source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
I’m curious to know where these files come from
Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 08:44:49 +
> Subject: [VOTE] - Approve the release of Apache Joshua incubating 6.1 (rc4)
> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Joshua community PPMCs and developers have voted and
> approved the proposal to release Apache Joshua 6.1 (in
ping, anyone ?!
Il giorno dom 7 mag 2017 alle ore 09:06 Henry Saputra <
henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> LICENSE file looks good
> NOTICE file looks good
> DISCLAIMER file looks good
> No 3rd party exes in source artifact
> Signature file for source looks good
> Hash files for source look g
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file looks good
No 3rd party exes in source artifact
Signature file for source looks good
Hash files for source look good
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Joshua c
Hello incubator PMCs,
The Apache Joshua community PPMCs and developers have voted and
approved the proposal to release Apache Joshua 6.1 (incubating).
Apache Joshua is a statistical machine translation toolkit.
[VOTE] thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-joshua-dev/201703.m
20 matches
Mail list logo
