+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Cheers,
Adam
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org
wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything
OSGI enterprisey then my -1 vote will stand.
Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread
Hi,
Results of the vote: 13 binding +1 votes, 2 binding -1 votes, 8
non-binding +1 votes.
Davanum Srinivas(*)+1
Craig L Russell(*) +1
Ant Elder(*) +1
Daniel Kulp+1
Matthias Wessendorf+1
Kevan Miller(*)+1
James Strachan(*)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything
OSGI enterprisey then my
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of
participants seems to have been constantly changing throughout the
vote, but we can only be voting on one proposal, so
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 21:40, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of
participants seems to have been constantly
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2242
I've already addressed those I could (i.e. confluence and svn)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 22:03, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 21:40, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM,
Hi Niclas,
2009/9/19 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
The real goal as it has
been said an OSGi Enterprise Programming Model, and the comparison
that has been made with Geronimo is not bad.
U... No.
The aim of
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything
OSGI enterprisey then my -1 vote will stand.
Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread that Aries will
seek to use components from other
On Sep 21, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org
wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything
OSGI enterprisey then my -1 vote will stand.
Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
The real goal as it has
been said an OSGi Enterprise Programming Model, and the comparison
that has been made with Geronimo is not bad.
U... No.
The aim of the project is to produce a large and healthy community of
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
targeting an exit as a felix sub-project would require the aries
proposes to start again with approval from the felix proposal and so
on. it may also prove controversial.
You missed the point. It is
I guess this is really a wording problem. I don't think anyone is
thinking about bringing Geronimo, James, ServiceMix, CXF, Axis,
ActiveMQ or anything like that into Aries. The real goal as it has
been said an OSGi Enterprise Programming Model, and the comparison
that has been made with Geronimo
Folks,
I see Niall, Leo, Jeremy, Robert, Bill and Guillaume respond to concerns from Jim and Niclas. It would be invaluable if
any incubator PMC members with concerns (or without!) could help us as mentors during the incubation process.
Here's the list of votes so far (see below). Noel, can
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
...I am hoping that other incubator PMC members who have not VOTE'd would cast
their ballot as well...
That's a hard one...let's say
+1
But I expect the project to clarify its focus, and demonstrate
collaboration
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Stoddard wgstodd...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a really difficult time getting my head around Jim and Niclas'
objections that this is an umbrella project.
I think Jim came up with a good lithmus test; If it is unclear what
should NOT go into a project...
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Stoddard wgstodd...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a really difficult time getting my head around Jim and Niclas'
objections that this is an umbrella project.
I think Jim came up
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
2009/9/16 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
...
IMO this is more a graduation issue, rather than something that should
prevent entry to the incubator - since thats when destination is
decided. There are many
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
1: From the get-go, this appears headed towards an umbrella project.
Too many ways to
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman
nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
wrote:
After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
1: From the get-go, this appears
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After much thought, I am
2009/9/16 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
...
IMO this is more a graduation issue, rather than something that should
prevent entry to the incubator - since thats when destination is
decided. There are many possible outcomes from that -
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing the diversity of committers from the
start. The proposal
+1 Accept Aries for incubation
-- dims
On 09/15/2009 11:54 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of
+1
Craig
On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers,
+1
...ant
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
+1
Dan
On Tue September 15 2009 11:54:10 am Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial
+1
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Dan
On Tue September 15 2009 11:54:10 am Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
+1
--kevan
On Sep 15, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers,
+1
2009/9/15 Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing the
+1
On Tuesday, September 15, 2009, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial
+1 Accept Aries for incubation
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 Accept Aries for incubation
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing the diversity of committers
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
Please cast your votes:
+1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing
+1
Niall
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of
+1
Donald
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing the diversity of
+1
Joe Bohn
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing the diversity of
[x] +1 Accept Aries for incubation
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After much thought, I am voting -1 for 1 main reason.
1: From the get-go, this appears headed towards an umbrella project.
Too many ways to justify yeah, this belongs here and far too
few ways to justify nope, this
On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The Aries proposal thread has now gone quiet and we would like to call
a vote to accept Aries into the Incubator. There has been some good
discussion with a few changes to the proposal including the addition
of initial committers, increasing
46 matches
Mail list logo
