[VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can be found on the Apache Wiki, and reproduced bel

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On Feb 9, 2008 5:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote o

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

On Feb 9, 2008 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on t

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Craig L Russell wrote: | +1 | | Craig | | On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: | |> Project Name: CouchDB |> - |> |> == Proposal == |> The goal is to create either an Apache top level project around the |> existi

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 Craig On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: Project Name: CouchDB - == Proposal == The goal is to create either an Apache top level project around the existing CouchDB open source project. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.s

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

On Feb 9, 2008 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on t

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 -- am excited to have CouchDB starting incubation. On Feb 9, 2008 11:51 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > +1 > > > Craig L Russell wrote: > | +1 > | > | Craig > | > | On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > | > |> Proj

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 (non-binding) and Welcome !!! On Feb 9, 2008 4:22 PM, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 -- am excited to have CouchDB starting incubation. > > > > On Feb 9, 2008 11:51 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

On Feb 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On Feb 9, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 El sáb, 09-02-2008 a las 11:09 -0500, Sam Ruby escribió: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on t

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On 2/9/08, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on the propo

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 Paul On Feb 10, 2008 11:58 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > > On 2/9/08, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > > proceeded

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 (non-binding) Cheers Daniel S. Haischt Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the prop

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

> ...Now it is time to vote... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

On Feb 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: I would like to proudly start this off with my +1. +1! Project Name: CouchDB - == Proposal == The goal is to create either an Apache top level project around the existing CouchDB open source project. Key Features: * a

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 (non binding) Assaf On 2/9/08, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can be found on the Apache Wiki,

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

"Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

Hi, On Feb 9, 2008 6:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now it is time to vote on the proposal which can be found on the > Apache Wiki, and reproduced below. +1 BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

On Feb 9, 2008 4:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on th

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 Niall On Feb 9, 2008 4:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On Feb 9, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to vote on the proposal whic

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation - PASSED!

On Feb 9, 2008 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages > of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we > proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. > Now it is time to vote on t

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation - PASSED!

Hi, I'm Jan Lehnardt, one of the contributers of the CouchDB project. On Feb 12, 2008, at 20:36, Sam Ruby wrote: On Feb 9, 2008 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] 72 hours, two dozen votes, all positive, many binding. This vote clearly passes. First: Thank you for accepting

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation - PASSED!

Hi, I'm Jan Lehnardt, one of the contributers of the CouchDB project. On Feb 12, 2008, at 20:36, Sam Ruby wrote: On Feb 9, 2008 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] 72 hours, two dozen votes, all positive, many binding. This vote clearly passes. First: Thank you for accepting

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation - PASSED!

Hi Jan, All new committers for CouchDB should read this: incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html> and if you have not submitted a Contributor License agreement, you should do so as quickly as possible so that we can get your accounts created www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cl

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation - PASSED!

Hey, On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:16:27PM -0800, Ted Leung wrote: > I've just submitted a request for the appropriate mailing lists. You > can track via: I just realised that the original proposal makes no mention of a wiki. We're currently using