Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Thanks Marvin for the clarification. An annotation would *really* help while I keep pushing the SGA. debo On 12/6/15, 7:46 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: >On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) >wrote: >> Hi Owen >> >> This is good. >>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Hi Owen This is good. The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be unaware of the Metron proposal - till we talked about the SGA). Would it be possible to put an addendum to the original

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Debo, Typically, at this point, it would be recommended to vote in additional committers. John On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:43 PM Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Hi Owen > > This is good. > > The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and > would like

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Hi Owen > > This is good. > > The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and > would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be > unaware of the Metron proposal -

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

With 10 binding +1's and 10 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote to accept Metron in the Apache Incubator passes. Thank you everyone. Binding +1's: Owen O'Malley Chris Nauroth Chris Mattmann Seetharan Venkatesh P. Taylor Goetz Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Brock Noland Billie Rinaldi

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The vote has finished, but I think it is important to get an SGA here. This is exactly the issue that hung up Kylin's graduation. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator +1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota" <james.sir...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >+1 (non-binding) > From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 8:06 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 8:06 AM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator > > > >+1 (binding) > > > >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as well. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thursday, December 3, 2015, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as well. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

t; > > On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota" <james.sir...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > >+1 (non-binding) > > > From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > Sent: Friday

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Yes Š still on it. debo On 12/3/15, 1:34 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >I think it would be prudent to at least try to get an SGA from Cisco, but >it looks like Debo is trying to help out with that. > >-Taylor > >> On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1. All the very best. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Let me ping my contact as well. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I am also working on my contacts to find the right person. > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:34 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 12/3/15, 9:33 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >whether >Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted >below and is available on the wiki as well.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is > pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an SGA for cleanliness. The only answer that I heard was that corporations don't like to do things like and so Cisco hadn't been asked. That seems like an insufficient answer. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Owen

[VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal We've added a paragraph in the background section

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding). Solid apache mentors and team. Good luck! On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Good luck. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1, assuming no legal issues WRT Cisco. Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Good luck. > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) I think it would be prudent to at least try to get an SGA from Cisco, but it looks like Debo is trying to help out with that. -Taylor > On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on

RE: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 Regards, Brad Kolarov | Managing Partner, B23 LLC | b...@b23.io<mailto:b...@b23.io> | 703.957.9155 Original message From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org> Date: 12/03/2015 16:39 (GMT-05:00) To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] A

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 On 12/3/15, 3:30 PM, "Phillip Rhodes" wrote: >+1, assuming no legal issues WRT Cisco. > > >Phil > > >This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < >venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding). >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Thanks +Vinod > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) Would be interested in contributing Š. (from Cisco) debo On 12/3/15, 9:38 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >> The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Are any of the GitHub contributors to OpenSoc still at Cisco? That might help. -Alex On 12/3/15, 10:18 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) >wrote: > >> Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and > can help. Debo, If you can help get an SGA signed that would be great. I don't have any contacts in Cisco, so I didn't have anywhere to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Will find out and get back. debo On 12/3/15, 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Are any of the GitHub contributors to OpenSoc still at Cisco? That might >help. > >-Alex > >On 12/3/15, 10:18 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >>On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for > an > > SGA for cleanliness. > > > The answer that I gave you on

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

I am also working on my contacts to find the right person. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:34 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I think it would be prudent to at least try to get an SGA from Cisco, but > it looks like Debo is trying to help out with that. > > -Taylor >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an > SGA for cleanliness. The answer that I gave you on board@apache was that large corporations don't sign legal documents unless they perceive

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 12/3/15, 9:33 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > > >The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > >whether >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and can help. debo On 12/3/15, 9:39 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for >an >SGA for cleanliness. > >The only answer that I heard was that