+ 1 (non-binding)
Regards
Liang
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-PredictionIO-into-the-Apache-Incubator-tp49739p49872.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com
The
VOTE
to
a
ccept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator
has concluded and passed with 20 binding +1s, 8 non-binding +1s, and no 0
or -1 votes.
Thanks to all who voted.
Binding +1s
Andrew Purtell
Luciano Resende
James Taylor
Suneel Marthi
Chris Nauroth
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator...
+1
-Bertrand
+ 1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Sandeep
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Paul
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > - Tsuyoshi
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM,
+1 (binding)
Paul
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> - Tsuyoshi
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell
+1 (non-binding)
- Tsuyoshi
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
>> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
>> to call a VOTE
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal:
+1
-Jake
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
+1 (binding)
— Hitesh
> On May 23, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal:
+1 (binding)
All the best,
Venkatesh
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:15 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ralph
>
> > On May 24, 2016, at 3:44 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell
+1 (binding)
Ralph
> On May 24, 2016, at 3:44 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
>> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
>> to call a VOTE
>> on
+1
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
>
> [
+1 (binding)
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Andrew Purtell
wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal:
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Uma
On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
>Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
>to call a VOTE
>on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
>Proposal:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 05/24/2016 12:22 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
to call a VOTE
on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
[ ] +1 Accept
+1 (non-binding) great to see it coming to ASF
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:20 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>
> > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal:
+1 Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:apurt...@apache.org]
Sent: 24 May 2016 03:52
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator
Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016, 6:23 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:46 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ted Dunning
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
> >
>
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
>
> >Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> >to call a VOTE
> >on accepting
+1
On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
>Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
>to call a VOTE
>on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
>Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
>
>[ ] +1 Accept
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
>
> [ ] +1
+1 (binding)
--Chris Nauroth
On 5/23/16, 3:22 PM, "Andrew Purtell" wrote:
>Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
>to call a VOTE
>on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
>Proposal:
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal:
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>
> > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would
> like
> > to call a VOTE
> >
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal:
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell
> wrote:
>
> > Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would
> like
> > to call a VOTE
> >
Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
to call a VOTE
on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
[ ] +1 Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator
[ ] +0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Do not accept
30 matches
Mail list logo