Thanks Doug. No problem at all. :-)
Regards,
Uma
On 9/24/16, 10:15 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Gangumalla, Uma
> wrote:
>> BTW, there were 5 binding votes.
>
>Oops. Sorry for the miscount! I mistakenly searched for "Gangumalla"
>rather than "umamahesh" in
>htt
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Gangumalla, Uma
wrote:
> BTW, there were 5 binding votes.
Oops. Sorry for the miscount! I mistakenly searched for "Gangumalla"
rather than "umamahesh" in
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc, but
I should have known better regardles
Congrats Spot team.
BTW, there were 5 binding votes.
Regards,
Uma
On 9/23/16, 3:33 PM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
>The vote passes, with 7 +1 votes (4 binding) and no -1 votes.
>
>+1 Jarek Jarcec Cecho (binding)
>+1 Gangumalla, Uma
>+1 Todd Lipcon (binding)
>+1 Tom White (binding)
>+1 Zheng, Kai
>+
The vote passes, with 7 +1 votes (4 binding) and no -1 votes.
+1 Jarek Jarcec Cecho (binding)
+1 Gangumalla, Uma
+1 Todd Lipcon (binding)
+1 Tom White (binding)
+1 Zheng, Kai
+1 Stack (binding)
+1 Debo Dutta
Thanks all for voting.
Spot has been accepted for Incubation at Apache. Welcome Spot!
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 22, 2016, at 12:57 AM, Tom White wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Tom
>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
>> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>>
>> [] +1 Accept Spot into the A
+1 (binding)
St.Ack
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Spot into the Apache Incu
+1 (non-binding). Thanks!
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Tom White [mailto:tom.e.wh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:57 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
+1
Tom
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Doug
+1
Tom
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Spot into the Apache Incubator because
+1 (binding)
-Todd
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Spot into the Apache Incu
+1(binding)
Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
Regards,
Uma
On 9/20/16, 11:15 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
>Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
>accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
>[] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
>[] +0 Abstain.
>[] -1 Do not a
[ X ] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
Jarcec
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do
Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
[] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept Spot into the Apache Incubator because ...
This vote will run for the usual 72 hours.
The proposal is attached,
12 matches
Mail list logo