Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator +1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota" <james.sir...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >+1 (non-binding) > From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 8:06 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 8:06 AM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator > > > >+1 (binding) > > > >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thursday, December 3, 2015, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

t; > > On 12/4/15, 10:00 AM, "james sirota" <james.sir...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > >+1 (non-binding) > > > From: Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org> > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > Sent: Friday

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >>whether >> Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is >>pasted >> below and is a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1. All the very best. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

g> wrote: >> > >> > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >> whether >> > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is >> pasted >> > below and is available on the wiki as well. >> > >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 12/3/15, 9:33 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <omal...@apache.org> wrote: >The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >whether >Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted >below and is a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is > pasted below and is available on t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as well. > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronPro

[VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal We've added a paragraph in the background section

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding). Solid apache mentors and team. Good luck! On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The propos

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

hread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether > > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is > pasted > > below and is available on the wiki as well. > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

80) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd li

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is available on the wiki as well. > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal > > We've added a paragraph in the background section discussing how Apache &

RE: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

ccept Metron into Apache Incubator +1 (binding) Thanks +Vinod > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

> >> > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >> > whether >> > > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podl

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Thanks +Vinod > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

ead has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on >> whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The >>proposal is >> pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal >> >> We've added a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Are any of the GitHub contributors to OpenSoc still at Cisco? That might help. -Alex On 12/3/15, 10:18 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) >wrote: > >> Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and > can help. Debo, If you can help get an SGA signed that would be great. I don't have any contacts in Cisco, so I didn't have anywhere to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Will find out and get back. debo On 12/3/15, 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Are any of the GitHub contributors to OpenSoc still at Cisco? That might >help. > >-Alex > >On 12/3/15, 10:18 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: > >>On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > below and is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for > an > > SGA for cleanliness. > > > The answer that I gave you on

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

that. > > -Taylor > > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether > > Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposa

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an > SGA for cleanliness. The answer that I gave you on board@apache was that large corporations don't sign legal documents unless they perceive

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

s would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > >whether > >Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted > >below and is available on the wiki as well. > > > >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal > > > >We've added a parag

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

gt;The only answer that I heard was that corporations don't like to do things >like and so Cisco hadn't been asked. > >That seems like an insufficient answer. > > > >On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > >> The [DISCUSS] thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Think I've missed the vote window, but > > +1 binding > > I will repeat what I raised when the proposal first came up, something that > wasn't addresses at all: ZeroMQ is LGPL, which is forbidden as a mandatory >

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

Vote has passed with 7 binding +1 from : Hitesh Shah, Luciano Resende, Sam Ruby, Chris A Mattmann, Jim Jagielski, Reynold Xin, Steve Loughran and 2 non-binding +1 from Sree V, Luke Han. There is an issue with the project name, see discussion at [1]. We will be identifying a new name for the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Sree V wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree > > > On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM, Reynold Xin > wrote: > > > +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

Think I've missed the vote window, but +1 binding I will repeat what I raised when the proposal first came up, something that wasn't addresses at all: ZeroMQ is LGPL, which is forbidden as a mandatory dependency in ASF projects. Step 1 of the project is going to have to confirm that the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) - Sam Ruby On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the > acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The > full proposal is > available at the end

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator >+1 (binding) > >- Sam Ruby > >On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on &

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on > the acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. > The full proposal is >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Nov 30, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > >> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > >> After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on >> the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanking you.With RegardsSree On Monday, November 30, 2015 3:21 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: +1 > On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:08 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > And off-course, Here is my +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:33

[VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and on the wiki at : https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ToriiProposal Please cast your votes: [

Re: [VOTE] Accept Torii into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) — Hitesh On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion (under the name Spark-Kernel), please vote on the > acceptance of Torii Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The > full proposal is > available at the end of

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

Vote has passed with 6 binding votes from : Luciano Resende, Henry Saputra, Chris A Mattmann Till Westmann Seetharam Venkatesh Julian Hyde And two non-binding votes from: Arun Manoharan Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara and no other votes. Thanks On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Luciano Resende

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 Madhawa On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > > > After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML > > Project for incubation at the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

++ -Original Message- From: "Manoharan, Arun" <armanoha...@ebay.com> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 11:36 PM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 On 27 Oct 2015, at 21:52, Luciano Resende wrote: After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and on the wiki at : https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SystemML

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

Luciano, There is a copy/paste error pointing to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Nuvem. Sent from my iPhone 6 Plus > On Oct 27, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > >> >> After

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck guys! On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML > Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is > available at the end of this message and on

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 (Non-binding) On 10/27/15, 11:08 PM, "Raymond Feng" wrote: >Luciano, > >There is a copy/paste error pointing to >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Nuvem. > >Sent from my iPhone 6 Plus > >> On Oct 27, 2015, at 10:03 PM, Luciano Resende >>wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Oct 28, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh > wrote: > > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:39 AM Till Westmann wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 27 Oct 2015, at 21:52, Luciano Resende wrote: >> >>> After initial

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Thanks! On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:39 AM Till Westmann wrote: > +1 > > On 27 Oct 2015, at 21:52, Luciano Resende wrote: > > > After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML > > Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML > Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is > available at the end of this message and on the wiki at : > >

[VOTE] Accept SystemML into Apache Incubator

After initial discussion, please vote on the acceptance of SystemML Project for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and on the wiki at : https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SystemML Please cast your

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

With 20 positive votes (13 binding and 7 non-binding) and no negative vote, the vote to accept Freemarker into the Incubator is successful. We will proceed with the project initial setup. Thank you, Jacopo +1 Pierre Smits Sergio Fernández (*) Jean-Baptiste Onofré (*) Bertrand Delacretaz (*)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

Congratulations Jacopo, Best regards, Pierre Op vrijdag 26 juni 2015 heeft Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org het volgende geschreven: With 20 positive votes (13 binding and 7 non-binding) and no negative vote, the vote to accept Freemarker into the Incubator is successful. We will

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Siegfried Goeschl On 19 Jun 2015, at 09:15, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On 06/19/2015 09:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: [ ] +1 accept Freemarker into the Apache Incubator Cheers Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Jun 19, 2015 3:16 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail.

[VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is open for at least the next 72 hours: [ ] +1 accept Freemarker into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 06/19/2015 09:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Ralph On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) have fun jan i. On 19 June 2015 at 15:10, Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Jacopo On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Jacques Le 19/06/2015 09:15, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 Jacopo On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: Following the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote: ...Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project +1 It might be difficult to grow a large enough community with such a mature

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On 2015-06-19 09:15, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is open for at least the next

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

WIth 10 binding +1 votes and 7 non-binding +1 votes, and with no votes against, the vote passes. Thanks to all who voted. Let us start in on the work getting Trafodiion set up as an incubator podling. Yours, St.Ack P.S. Here is a link to the vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non binding) On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Anoop- On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Chris Nauroth cnaur...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 5/19/15, 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 good luck! On Wednesday, May 20, 2015, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net javascript:; wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 05/20/2015 09:04 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: +1 (binding) On May 19, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On May 19, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck guys! - Henry On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor On May 19, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 [binding] On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:27PM, Stack wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 5/19/15, 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this

RE: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: saint@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:58 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -Dan On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Enis On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this

[VOTE] Accept Trafodion into Apache Incubator

Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is open for at least the next 72 hours: [ ] +1 accept Trafodion into

[RESULT][VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

Voting to accept Sentry in Apache Incubator is closed now. The vote has passed. The tally is as below, Binding +1s, Henry Saputra Patrick Hunt Roman Shaposhnik Marvin Humphrey Olivier Lamy Alan Cabrera Tom White Chip Childers Joe Brockmeier Arvind Prabhakar Non-binding +1s Ashish

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

The voting is now closed. The results have been sent out in a separate thread. Thanks. Shreepadma On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote: [X] +1 Accept Sentry in the Incubator (binding) Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:23 AM,

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 Accept Sentry in the Incubator Thanks, Tom On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at:

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -- Andrei Savu On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at:

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:23:44AM -0700, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SentryProposal and is also pasted

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 Accept On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: +1 Accept Sentry in the Incubator Regards, Patrick On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Sravya Tirukkovalur sra...@cloudera.comwrote: +1 Accept On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: +1 Accept Sentry in the Incubator Regards, Patrick On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Shreepadma

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013, at 08:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SentryProposal and is also pasted to the

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at:

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in

<    1   2   3   4   >