[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-09 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Hi, The voting period is now closed. The vote passes with: 3 binding +1s (Todd L, Michael S, Justin M) 0 binding -1s Thanks to everyone who tried the release and voted. Looks like we have a few more license-related things to tweak, we'll try to get that done for 0.8.0 (which I'm RMing) in April

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > OK. Are you suggesting that for our next release we go back to fully > copying all licenses into LICENSE.txt rather than providing pointers? (i.e. > essentially reverting back to what we did for 0.7.0?) The short form is currently preferred. In license [1] you have the full text of most li

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-08 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The specific cases of BSD-licensed software here is FindProtobuf.cmake, > which > > is a build-time-only dependency and does not become part of the binary > > distribution. > > If there is a binary distribution why was it not voted

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The specific cases of BSD-licensed software here is FindProtobuf.cmake, which > is a build-time-only dependency and does not become part of the binary > distribution. If there is a binary distribution why was it not voted on at the same time? Normally if something is the binary and not in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-08 Thread Todd Lipcon
Hi Justin, Thanks for voting (and for your +1 despite there being some questions). Responses inline: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - signatures and hashes fine > - name contains incubating > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - name contains incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - No unexpected binaries - Source file have apache headers (some have extra ones) - Can compile on OS X (but it takes a while) I still think there’s a couple of minor i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-06 Thread Stack
+1 (binding) Checked signature, hash, and compared tarball to git tag. Built it successfully. Ran unit tests. Poked around. Licenses look good. St.Ack On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2 passed and I'm

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-06 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
It was built from this tag: https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-kudu.git;a=commit;h=dd1757f2f44ab36a24a4503cb7920f3530dab08c On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:34 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:21 PM Jean-Daniel Cryans > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The PPMC vote to re

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-06 Thread John D. Ament
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:21 PM Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2 passed and I'm > now submitting this to the IPMC. > > Vote thread: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201603.mbox/%3CCAGpTDNfBpLCqYEeArpDUFM0

[VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

2016-03-06 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Hi, The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2 passed and I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201603.mbox/%3CCAGpTDNfBpLCqYEeArpDUFM0EUvW-aOUHDpCtCQARetHTY%2BUACw%40mail.gmail.com%3E Result: http://mail-ar