On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:48:19AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
You might want to use a different extension in the future (.sha512) to
reduce the confusion in particular since most Java projects only provide
sha1 hashes.
That makes sense to me, but it's contrary to the documentation on the
On 2011-08-07, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Release candidate 3 for Apache Lucy (incubating) version 0.2.0 can
be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~marvin/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3/
See the CHANGES file at the top level of the archive for information about the
content of this
On 2011-08-09, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 02:45:30PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
No kind of functional testing performed, just the normal sanity checks.
Great, thank you for the review!
What kind of SHA algo has been used for the .sha file?
SHA512.
GPG was used to
Hello,
Release candidate 3 for Apache Lucy (incubating) version 0.2.0 can
be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~marvin/apache-lucy-incubating-0.2.0-rc3/
See the CHANGES file at the top level of the archive for information about the
content of this release.
This candidate was assembled
