After 72 hours, with seven +1 binding votes, one +1 non-binding votes,
and no -1 votes, here is the tally:
+1 binding:
Justin Mclean
Henri Yandell
John Ament
Sebastian
Sergio Fernandez
Suneel Marthi
Tommaso Teofili
+1 non-binding:
Chris Olivier
Thanks to all who voted!
Chris
+1 (binding)
Il giorno dom 3 dic 2017 alle ore 16:22 Suneel Marthi
ha scritto:
> +1 binding
>
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Most of the minor issues I've seen so far are already reported by Justin.
+1 binding
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Most of the minor issues I've seen so far are already reported by Justin.
> So let's address them for the next release. Good luck at NIPS!
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2017 4:45 PM, "Chris Olivier"
Many of them are stand-alone project on their own that MXNet happens to
depend on. Major open source projects other than MXNet depend on these
projects(e.g. XGBoost depend on dmlc-core). So, for now, they can be
viewed as external dependencies like boost.
DMLC have talked about migrating more
+1 (binding)
Most of the minor issues I've seen so far are already reported by Justin.
So let's address them for the next release. Good luck at NIPS!
On Nov 30, 2017 4:45 PM, "Chris Olivier" wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
Henri,
I added your comments related to notice and licensing to the same issue
here - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8913
and created a separate issue to track the submodules here -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8920.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017
One question about the below. We've noted that much of the source code for
MXNet is coming from the external DMLC repos. Are there plans to move
those repos into the ASF?
John
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM Hen wrote:
> +1.
>
> Items I note should happen post release are:
+1.
Items I note should happen post release are:
* Move the various git submodules into third-party/ or similar so it's
simpler to see what is Apache original source when we review a release.
* Deal with the Copyright statements in perl-package (copyright holder has
approved doing this)
* Lots
+1
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:45 PM Chris Olivier
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0, release
> candidate 1.
>
>
> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
>
>
> *Vote thread:*
>
>
Hello Justin,
Thank you for your vote.
I have created a Github issue to track all your comments here -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8913
I will make sure all these issues are fixed soon after the 1.0.0 release.
Thanks,
Meghna Baijal
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:59 PM,
+1 (binding)
On 01.12.2017 04:30, Chris Olivier wrote:
+1
Additional note:
This MXNet v1.0 release is planned to be announced at the NIPS conference
starting Monday, 04-Dec and hence would request your support in meeting
this timeline. We will continue to address any non-critical issues after
Hi,
+1 binding (if the issues below are put in a JIRA and fixed for next release)
Much improved over RC0 but rat results are still hard to review. It’s reporting
2138 unknown licenses and I count 625 files without a license header so it’s
easy to miss something and I probably have. As
+1
Additional note:
This MXNet v1.0 release is planned to be announced at the NIPS conference
starting Monday, 04-Dec and hence would request your support in meeting
this timeline. We will continue to address any non-critical issues after
this release as well.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:45 PM,
Hello All,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.0.0, release
candidate 1.
Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
*Vote thread:*
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/568bf0c9960f14640b753a5fb6766c
7b0074339d286f405c04ffec96@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
14 matches
Mail list logo