With three binding +1's, two non-binding +1's and no -1's, the VOTE passed.
Binding +1's: Josh, Jakob and Jitendra
Non-binding +1's: Hugo and me
Thanks everyone for the support!
Tsz-Wo
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> Hi IPMC,
>
> The Apache Ratis
Hi Josh,
Thanks a lot for reviewing the RC and providing many useful comments.
I just have uploaded our KEY file to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ratis/KEYS
For the other issues, definitely will fix them in a later release.
Tsz-Wo
On 5/9/17, 8:26 AM, "Josh Elser"
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 5/9/17, 8:50 AM, "Jakob Homan" wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) brought forward from the podling vote.
>
> -Jakob
>
> On 9 May 2017 at 08:26, Josh Elser
+1 (binding)
On 5/9/17, 8:50 AM, "Jakob Homan" wrote:
+1 (binding) brought forward from the podling vote.
-Jakob
On 9 May 2017 at 08:26, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * sig/xsums OK
> * NOTICE ok, LICENSE is
+1 (binding) brought forward from the podling vote.
-Jakob
On 9 May 2017 at 08:26, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * sig/xsums OK
> * NOTICE ok, LICENSE is good enough (see below)
> * DISCLAIMER present
> * Incubating is in artifact name
> * Can build from source and
+1 (binding)
* sig/xsums OK
* NOTICE ok, LICENSE is good enough (see below)
* DISCLAIMER present
* Incubating is in artifact name
* Can build from source and could run tests
* All of your additions to LICENSE (over "stock") are unnecessary. The
trap you fell into is differentiating between
Hi IPMC,
The Apache Ratis community has voted and approved the proposal to
release Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.1.0-alpha rc0. We now
kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this
source-only incubator release.
Apache Ratis is an open source java implementation for