Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

2015-05-30 Thread Ted Dunning
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > So we now have Sentry artifacts being distributed which have not been > approved > by the full Incubator PMC. A similar situation with another project was > once > resolved by having the full PMC vote on the already-distributed > artifact

Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

2015-05-29 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > Apache Sentry >> >> This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the >> podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator. >> >> >> h

Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

2015-05-29 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Apache Sentry > > This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the > podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator. > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sentry-dev/20

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-05-10 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:05 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > svn log -v -r {2015-04-01}:HEAD > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator > > I'm noticing that a lot of unapproved releases are ending up in here. > These are the ones I've identified, with no matching result vote (that I > can

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-05-10 Thread John D. Ament
Was this vote ever resolved? On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:21 AM Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > > Make sure to include a voting record, not just the summary votes. It > helps > > to point at a single result e-mail to see everyone who voted, rather than > > having to dig through the thread. >

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-27 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, > Make sure to include a voting record, not just the summary votes. It helps > to point at a single result e-mail to see everyone who voted, rather than > having to dig through the thread. Understood. The URL to the bottom of the [VOTE] thread is here: https://www.mail-archive.co

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-27 Thread Matt Franklin
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:02 PM Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > The vote for Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating is now closed with a > final tally of: > > +1 (3) -- 0 (0) -- -1 (0) > Make sure to include a voting record, not just the summary votes. It helps to point at a single r

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-25 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, The vote for Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating is now closed with a final tally of: +1 (3) -- 0 (0) -- -1 (0) Thank you everyone for helping to get TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8 out. We will push to Central Repo on Monday. Take care, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 25, 2015,

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-25 Thread Henry Saputra
Signature file good Hashes file good LICENSE file good NOTICE file exists and GOOD No 3rd part executables in source package. +1 binding Good job - Henry On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much a

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-24 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello everyone, We need one more +1 vote to release. A review would be much appreciated. Thank you, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Apr 23, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Matt Franklin wrote: > +1 binding > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> (sending again as

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-23 Thread Matt Franklin
+1 binding On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > (sending again as sent from wrong address first time) > > +1 binding > > For the source release I checked: > - incubating in artifact name > - signatures and hashes good > - LICENSE and NOTICE ok > - All source files have

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-22 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Thanks for voting Justin. Appreciate it. > - I'm still not sure of the reason why some of the artefacts are named > gremlin rather than tinkerpop TinkerPop is the project as a whole. Within TinkerPop, there are various components. gremlin-core gremlin-groovy had

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding For the source release I checked: - incubating in artifact name - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE ok - All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary files - Still can’t compile from source but it tells me I have wrong java version - most of the issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, (sending again as sent from wrong address first time) +1 binding For the source release I checked: - incubating in artifact name - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE ok - All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary files - Still can’t compile from source but it t

[VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)

2015-04-20 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hello, Apache TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) would like to release TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating. We had a dev@ VOTE which resulted in a tally of +1 (3), 0 (0), and -1 (0). We now present our artifacts for vote by Incubator. The dev@ [VOTE] thread can be found here: