After more than 72 hours this vote has passed with 3 +1s from:
Anthony Elder
Davanum Srinivas
Robert Burrell Donkin
Thanks for reviewing and voting.
- Venkat
On 7/22/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
- robert
On 7/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
+1
- robert
On 7/20/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 7/20/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks ok to me now so +1.
>
>...ant
>
> On 7/18/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Thanks for taking a look and posting your obs
+1
On 7/20/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks ok to me now so +1.
...ant
On 7/18/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for taking a look and posting your observations.
>
> - The javadocs are not supposed to be there in the maven repo. They
>
Looks ok to me now so +1.
...ant
On 7/18/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking a look and posting your observations.
- The javadocs are not supposed to be there in the maven repo. They
seemed to have crept in by mistake. I have now deleted them.
-
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking a look and posting your observations.
- The javadocs are not supposed to be there in the maven repo. They
seemed to have crept in by mistake. I have now deleted them.
- I have also now uploaded the signatures for the maven artifacts.
Earlier, they got missed out d
On 7/16/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi IPMCers,
The Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 5 +1s:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg20
Hi IPMCers,
The Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 5 +1s:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg20077.html
The artifacts, including the binary and source
Yes. I notice it now. Thanks for finding this. I will go and spin
another RC to fix this.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/12/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 19:17, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Niclas, thanks for taking a look. But I see that the license is
> inc
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 19:17, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Niclas, thanks for taking a look. But I see that the license is
> included at the head of the source distro as well as in the specific
> module inside that distro. Am I missing your point here ?
Yes, indeed it exists in the LICENSE fi
Hi Niclas, thanks for taking a look. But I see that the license is
included at the head of the source distro as well as in the specific
module inside that distro. Am I missing your point here ?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/11/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 16:1
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 16:14, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
-1 (not veto)
I can't find that the licensing requirements listed in the source file
modules/implementation-script/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/implementation/script/engines/TuscanyJRubyScriptEngine.java
is met. Please include in LIC
Hi IPMCers,
The Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 6 +1s:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg19784.html
The artifacts, including the binary and source distributi
12 matches
Mail list logo
