On 7/12/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be
On 7/12/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be
+1.
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 08:48 +0200, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
On 7/13/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be
+1 (non-binding)
On 13 Jul 2006, at 07:48, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Jason van Zyl
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we
feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would
now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be found
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for
consideration. The proposal can be found in the Incubator wiki here:
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. **
Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our
new form based support ticket system.
To submit for support or
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. **
Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our
new form based support ticket system.
To submit for support or
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. **
Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our
new form based support ticket system.
To submit for support or
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. **
Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our
new form based support ticket system.
To submit for support or
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. **
Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our
new form based support ticket system.
To submit for support or
This message is for all users sending submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED];
** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. **
Aanval now requires all support and assistance requests to be entered into our
new form based support ticket system.
To submit for support or
I'd like to vote +1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Matthias
On 7/12/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to
+1
On 7/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to vote +1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Matthias
On 7/12/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been
On Jul 13, 2006, at 2:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal,
we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we
would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator
for consideration. The proposal can be
16 matches
Mail list logo