+1
On May 21, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the
+1
On 5/22/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On May 21, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the
I'm pulling this vote in order to update the definition of Mentors
per Jim and Justin's request. I'm hoping that the change is ok with
everyone else.
I'll have another patch ready for a vote shortly.
Craig
On May 22, 2007, at 7:05 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1
On May 21, 2007, at 5:05 PM,
At one point, we had people becoming members of the Incubator PMC by
virtue of being a Mentor or by virtue of a vote of the Incubator PMC.
Did that change? This language implies that the Mentors must be
pre-existing members of the Incubator PMC.
Is there a reason why we are saying chosen by the
Hi Ted,
On May 22, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
At one point, we had people becoming members of the Incubator PMC by
virtue of being a Mentor or by virtue of a vote of the Incubator PMC.
Did that change? This language implies that the Mentors must be
pre-existing members of the
On 5/22/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At one point, we had people becoming members of the Incubator PMC by
virtue of being a Mentor or by virtue of a vote of the Incubator PMC.
Did that change? This language implies that the Mentors must be
pre-existing members of the
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 07:52, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 22, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
OK, just so I understand. We have a Member who's not on the IPMC. He
or she agree to Mentor a candidate, but before the proposal is
tendered, the Member should first ask to be placed on the
+1 (non binding)
I do see other (nitpick) problems in the document that I'll address in
a separate issue (no need to hold back on this change).
Martijn
On 5/20/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and
Craig L Russell wrote:
Please review the changes in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well, mostly because
it takes an order of magnitude longer in time to parse a Jira incident rather
than approve a
On May 21, 2007, at 8:26 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well,
mostly because
it takes an order of magnitude longer in time to parse a Jira
incident rather
than approve a patch posted to the list. If you could at least
attach the
On May 20, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator
Policy, an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA
issue has .html files to review in addition
Hi Bill,
On May 20, 2007, at 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Please review the changes in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well,
mostly because
it takes an order of
On 5/21/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is, afaik, still some people who think that having
more than one Mentor is unwise (the old saw is more than
one mentor means no mentors)... If a podling wishes
to have just 1, we should honor that, I think.
Therefore I would think some
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the
Incubator PMC. A Mentor has responsibilities toward the Incubator
Out of curiosity, what form does the reporting to the Sponsor
and Incubator PMC take? If it's in writing and public, where
can the rest of the podling community see it?
Martin
Craig L Russell wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
Hi Martin,
On May 21, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Out of curiosity, what form does the reporting to the Sponsor
and Incubator PMC take? If it's in writing and public, where
can the rest of the podling community see it?
That detail is not documented anywhere.
Craig
Martin
Craig
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator Policy,
an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA issue
has .html files to review in addition to the patch.
[ ] +1 Accept the changes
[ ] -1 Don't
Hola,
On 5/20/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator Policy,
an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA issue
has .html files to review in
On Monday 21 May 2007 05:12, Craig L Russell wrote:
[x] +1 Accept the changes
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Craig L. Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
