Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

wrote: > FYI. Had the same address issue. > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com> > > Date: August 5, 2016 at 10:45:21 AM EDT > > To: gene...@apache.incubator.org > > Cc: d...@beam.incubator.apache.o

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

FYI. Had the same address issue. Begin forwarded message: > From: "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com> > Date: August 5, 2016 at 10:45:21 AM EDT > To: gene...@apache.incubator.org > Cc: d...@beam.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, v

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

+1 release looks good. For some reason, original email never came through. On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > gently reminder to the IPMC: we need at least one additional binding vote. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On 08/01/2016 06:46 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

+1 Sent from my iPhone, Venkatesh > On Aug 4, 2016, at 10:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > gently reminder to the IPMC: we need at least one additional binding vote. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > >> On 08/01/2016 06:46 PM, Dan Halperin wrote: >> Hey folks!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Hi, gently reminder to the IPMC: we need at least one additional binding vote. Thanks ! Regards JB On 08/01/2016 06:46 PM, Dan Halperin wrote: Hey folks! Here's the vote for the second release of Apache Beam: version 0.2.0-incubating. The complete staging area is available for your review,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Dan Halperin wrote: > > Apparently I thoroughly fat-fingered my initial mail and sent to > APACHE.INCUBATOR.org instead of the correct domain. > wow, I didn't realize about the mistake either... Sergio, would you mind re-sending your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Thanks for the review Justin and the website notes. Dan already created the corresponding Jira, we gonna fix that asap. Regards JB On 08/02/2016 02:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - file name contains incubating - signature and hash good - LICENSE and NOTICE good.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - file name contains incubating - signature and hash good - LICENSE and NOTICE good. (Although not 100% sure why the NOTICE mentions google twice) - No binary files in release - All source

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - file name contains incubating - signature and hash good - LICENSE and NOTICE good. (Although not 100% sure why the NOTICE mentions google twice) - No binary files in release - All source code has ASF headers - Can compile from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Hi general@incubator.apache.org, Apparently I thoroughly fat-fingered my initial mail and sent to APACHE.INCUBATOR.org instead of the correct domain. There are several IPMC members on the Beam-dev list (which was CC'ed) who thought I had correctly started the vote, but of course I had not. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Thanks very much Justin for your attention to detail! I've filed BEAM-510, BEAM-513, BEAM-514, BEAM-515 for the website issues you pointed out below, and I've sent PRs for 510 & 513. Though it may be obvious, I'll remind everyone that these proposed changes to the incubator-beam-site repository

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - file name contains incubating - signature and hash good - LICENSE and NOTICE good. (Although not 100% sure why the NOTICE mentions google twice) - No binary files in release - All source code has ASF headers - Can compile from source Just a few minor things I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

+1 (binding) casting my vote here as IPMC. I checked: - artefact names contain incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE file looks good - NOTICE file looks good - Source files have ASF headers - source distribution exists - Tested with GDELT samples and wordcount