The vote for releasing Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-incubating passed with 3
binding +1s, 0 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1.
Vote thread link:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201507.mbox/%3CCABQFKi1xMzduVruYXdA15BQkZGVaYnmOChSfUvMw3uWcHA1Beg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Binding +1s:
Hi Cedric,
It's dug down somewhere in my memories, I bet somebody like Marvin or
Roman or Ted could quickly pull out their magic hats the authoritative
link. There ore other projects that release in non-asf packages (e.g.
geronimo specs in javax.*) for very good reasons. I don't know what and
No such requirement actually exists
Jena graduated in April 2012 and because of our backwards compatibility
requirements the package names for existing code have until very recently
remained the same (though new code developed at Apache has used
org.apache.jena where possible)
Now we are finally
+1
I already voted in the PPMC vote, I am pasting below my findings.
Cheers,
Hadrian
--
Excellent work on the release Richard.
* tested the binaries on Linux, they work fine, although not my focus;
the ASF releases code as source, so I focused more on the source distro
*
This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache Brooklyn
0.7.0-incubating.
The Apache Brooklyn community have voted in favour of making this release:
Vote thread:
Hi Justin, Hadrian,
Yes, that's the justification for omitting the copyright header in those
files. From the incubator-general discussion for release
0.7.0-M2-incubating [1]:
This one has been previously discussed on our lists; our conclusion
with our mentors was that the archetype is
Hi Justin,
Being part of the maven archetype, these are the templates to
quickstart a user with a project using brooklyn. Such projects would
not be licensed to the ASF, but we could also say that it's then their
business to update the copyright header. I am kinda neutral on this one,
but I
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked the source release.
- release contains incubating
- signatures and hashed good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good (a few minor issues)
- no unexpected binary files
- some source files are missing headers (see
* renaming of packages from brooklyn.* to org.apache.brooklyn.* will be
required for graduation, I strongly encourage that step to be taken care of
in the next release.
Where is such a requirement described? As far as I understand, package
names are best suited if they start with org.apache.*,
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 07/22/2015 08:49 AM, Richard Downer wrote:
This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache Brooklyn
0.7.0-incubating.
The Apache Brooklyn community have voted in favour of making this release:
Vote thread:
10 matches
Mail list logo
