Cancel this vote because of the license issue. See details in the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8v4wy5o132rpsjync6465zztgjlf6h5p
Thanks to all who participated in the vote, I’m going to fix the issue and
prepare the next RC ASAP.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
Thanks for the advice, will update soon.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On Sep 19, 2023, at 20:11, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> I think it would be simpler to use the standard protobuf license. Just
> one file, including its copyright.
>
> https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/LICENSE
>
> On
I think it would be simpler to use the standard protobuf license. Just
one file, including its copyright.
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/LICENSE
On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 12:45, Cheng Pan wrote:
>
> PJ Fanning, both LICENSE-BSD-3.txt and LICENSE-BSD-3.txt are applied to
>
PJ Fanning, both LICENSE-BSD-3.txt and LICENSE-BSD-3.txt are applied to
protobuf-java, it was mentioned at the end of
client-spark/spark-3-shaded/LICENSE, please let me know if you have a better
idea of how to document clearly.
> BSD 3-clause
> See license/LICENSE-BSD-3.txt for details.
>
Thanks, Duo, will have a try.
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On Sep 19, 2023, at 19:30, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>
> I checked the pom for spark-3-shaded
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/blob/main/client-spark/spark-3-shaded/pom.xml
>
> You could try adding these transformers to the shade
I'll have a look around to see if there are other issues.
With the BSD license mentioned in the client-spark/spark-3-shaded
LICENSE, could it be adjusted to say which libs it applies to?
I checked the pom for spark-3-shaded
https://github.com/apache/incubator-celeborn/blob/main/client-spark/spark-3-shaded/pom.xml
You could try adding these transformers to the shade plugin to see if it helps
false
Cheng Pan 于2023年9月19日周二 19:17写道：
>
> Hi PJ Fanning,
>
>
Hi PJ Fanning,
Thanks for pointing out this issue, it was considered but seems broken
recently, unfortunately.
The proposed NOTICE and LICENSE files are under [1], would you mind taking a
look? If it's OK, I’m going to investigate and fix the packaging issue then.
Given it’s a license issue,
I have some concerns over the jars that are part of the release.
I looked at celeborn-client-spark-3-shaded_2.12-0.3.1-incubating.jar in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheceleborn-1039/org/apache/celeborn/celeborn-client-spark-3-shaded_2.12/0.3.1-incubating/
The jar
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
- git commit hash is correct.
- links are valid.
- "incubating" is in the name.
- PGP keys are good.
- hashes are correct.
- LICENSE looks good.
- NOTICE looks good.
- DISCLAIMER exists.
- build success from source code (macOS). ``` ./build/make-distribution.sh
Hi, Duo,
Thanks for voting and verification.
> 'mvn test -Pflink-1.17', I'm not sure whether this is the correct
it probably works, it’s recommended to use `build/mvn` instead of bare `mvn` to
build and test, which will use or download the `mvn` with the exact
`maven.version` declared in
+1 binding
Checked sigs and sums: Matched
LICENSE and NOTICE: OK
DISCLAIMER: In place
Built from source:
‘./build/make-distribution.sh -Pflink-1.17’, successfully generated
the tarball
Run UTs:
'mvn test -Pflink-1.17', I'm not sure whether this is the correct
way as the README does not
Hi IPMC,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn (Incubating)
0.3.1-incubating-rc2
The Apache Celeborn community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Celeborn (Incubating) version 0.3.1-incubating-rc2.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote
13 matches
Mail list logo
