Hi folks,
I'm canceling the vote for Falcon 0.5-incubating, candidate 3 as there were
issues with license. Will have a new RC soon.
--
Regards,
Venkatesh
“Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.”
- Antoine de
Hi Justin,
Thanks for taking time to review. Falcon uses bootstrap Version: v3.0.2
which is Apache License 2.0.
There is a file in the Falcon source release called bootstrap.js which
contains the following header:
/*!
* Bootstrap v3.0.2 by @fat and @mdo
* Copyright 2013 Twitter, Inc.
*
Hi,
There is a file in the Falcon source release called bootstrap.js which
contains the following header.
Thanks for clarifying that, it does look like the older version of bootstrap is
under Apache and not MIT like the current version. However the LICENSE is still
probably incorrect as
All are Apache License 2.0.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
There is a file in the Falcon source release called bootstrap.js which
contains the following header.
Thanks for clarifying that, it does look like the older version of
I also suggest you look at these for the next release.
- a few files may be missing Apache headers (.twiki and .patch files)
twiki as I have explained earlier has a limitation on comments. I did add a
license.txt in the folder granting ALv2 as you had suggested in an earlier
rc.
- Is copyright
Hi,
All are Apache License 2.0.
Are you 100% positive? I don't know the exact version included or if these
links are representative of the bundled software but none of them look to be
Apache licences at a casual glance.
BSD licensed:
https://github.com/mbostock/d3/blob/master/LICENSE
MIT
Hi,
-1 (binding) issues with LICENSE
Looks like source is bundling MIT licensed Bootstrap, MIT licensed D3JS, MIT
licensed dagre and MIT licensed dust, all of those need to be added to LICENSE.
There may be others I've missed. See [1] on how to do this.
I checked:
- vote thread good
-
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 07/09/2014 05:33 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a build for Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating, release candidate
3. Thanks to everyone who have contributed to this release.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 4 +1's.
I'm canceling the vote as there was a valid -1 to the release.
Thanks Justin and Sebb for your feedback. Have opened jira's to address the
issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-412
Thanks!
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh
venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote:
On 19 May 2014 22:09, Seetharam Venkatesh venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote:
Hello folks,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.5 incubating release.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 8 +1's.
Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/xtf
Results thread: Apache mail is
Hi Justin,
Thanks for reviewing the release artifacts.
NOTICE and LICENCE seem to contain too much (see believe)
We will take care of this for the next release. Is this a blocker for the
release?
There's a binary in the release
This is in test source and is used to run a workflow which only
Hi,
We will take care of this for the next release. Is this a blocker for the
release?
I'm willing to see other people thoughts on it - but it's likely to be so.
I am also willing to change my vote if someone with more experience than me
says it's OK for now.
There's a binary in the release
Hi,
-1 (binding) due to binary in the release + possible LICENSE/NOTICE issues
Signature + hashes good
DISCLAIMER correct
NOTICE and LICENCE seem to contain too much (see believe)
All source files have correct headers
There's a binary in the release
Can compile from source
Test pass
What
Hi,
Sorry for to mention the binary in question is:
webapp/src/test/resources/org/apache/falcon/logging/java-test.jar
Thanks,
Justin
Hello folks,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.5 incubating release.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 8 +1's.
Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/xtf
Results thread: Apache mail is slow and do not see it in archives after 2
days.
The source tarball
15 matches
Mail list logo
