[RESULT] was: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Hi Everyone, VOTING for Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) v2.0.0 has closed on both dev@ and general@. This Major release includes a wealth of additional features beyond v1.0.0, notably: 1. Interval Logs 2. WebExtensionSupport for Chrome/Firefox 3. API support for filtering, mapping, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Yes, when I say "probably worth correcting" I mean for future builds if possible. Good luck with the release. Cheers, Paul. Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Thanks, Paul. Yes, some of our webextension files are build from a few other source files. The best way we could manage to get headers in those these build files resulted in some repetition of headers from various arc files. We’ll see if we can’t find a better way, but at present we’re leaning

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

+1 (binding) Checked: * incubator in name * LICENSE/NOTICE files * checksums * ASF headers in files (though a few js files in UserAleWebExtension have the header repeated multiple times - not a big deal but probably worth correcting unless these files are generated that way) Cheers, Paul.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Hi Folks, 72 hours has passed on our VOTE on general@ to Release Apache Flagon v2.0.0. We are missing one binding VOTE from IPMC to release. Please review and VOTE. We presently have +4 community votes & +2 binding votes. No one has voted +0 or -1. Thanks! Joshua Poore > On Jun 29, 2019,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Ok, cool. We’ll get it right on Master. Joshua Poore > On Jun 30, 2019, at 1:19 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> Is it just the Copyright symbol that’s incorrect? Or do you see something >> else. Just checking so that I know what to fix. Its the only thing I can see >> as different

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

HI, > Is it just the Copyright symbol that’s incorrect? Or do you see something > else. Just checking so that I know what to fix. Its the only thing I can see > as different from [1] Sorry, incorrect to probably not teh right word. I just noticed it was different to the standard one. Probably

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Hi Justin, Thanks for the review! RE License appendix: Is it just the Copyright symbol that’s incorrect? Or do you see something else. Just checking so that I know what to fix. Its the only thing I can see as different from [1] reads as follwos: APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes fine - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue (see below) - NOTICE is fine - all ASF files have correct headers As noted above the LICENSE file has incorrect copyright line in the license appendix. Thanks, Justin

[VOTE] Release Apache Flagon (Incubating) v2.0.0

Hi Folks, Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon 2.0.0 Release Candidate # 2. About Flagon: http://flagon.incubator.apache.org/ We require +2 binding votes from PMC to proceed with the release. Our community and mentors have voted on this release with the