Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Release Managers - This brings up a good point. Please make sure you are consulting published artifacts to identify binding votes - don't rely on the poster to state that they are or are not binding. One such source is https://home.apache.org/phonebook.html John On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:59 PM

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

I was told that John Ament is a incubator PMC member, which makes his vote binding. So, the revised tally is: vote passes with 4 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1 and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: Justin Mclean Roman Shaposhnik Henry Saputra John Ament. Thanks all for voting! and Thanks John for you feedb

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

This vote passes with 3 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1 and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: Justin Mclean Roman Shaposhnik Henry Saputra Thanks for voting! -Swapnil. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Checking the source release artifact: > > LICENSE file looks good > DISCLAIMER f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Checking the source release artifact: LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists RAT check passes No 3rd party exes in the source artifacts Signature files look good Hash files look good +1 (binding) - Henry On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hello, > > This is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

+1 release contents look good. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:14 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating. > > This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.RC2, has successfully passed > a vote for a release > on the geo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating. > > This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.RC2, has successfully passed > a vote for a release > on the geode developer mailing list. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, > Much of the text in the NOTICE is propagated from Apache Lucene > (https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/lucene/NOTICE.txt). > You may want to consider only including the bits that are needed as to reduce t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Justin, thanks for the quick review! Comments inline. > On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - files name contain incubating > - signatures and hashes good > - DISCLAIMER exists > - NOTICE and LICENSE have some very minor issues (see below)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - files name contain incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE and LICENSE have some very minor issues (see below) - No unexpected binary files - All Apache files have ASF headers - Can compile from source Minor license issues: - How is this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

The last statement should have said: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Geode 1.0.0-incubating (rather than 1.0.0-incubating.M1). On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incuba

[VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Hello, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release 1.0.0-incubating. This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.RC2, has successfully passed a vote for a release on the geode developer mailing list. Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/bjj6aumdkwsmaw2p Results: http:/