Hi,
+1 (binding) from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
- No unexpected binary files
- Checked PGP signatures
- Checked checksums
- Code compiles and tests successfully run
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 5:50 AM Xun Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (no b
Hi,
+1 (no binging)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- LICENSE seem to include software that is not bundled in the source
release
- NOTICE is fine
- DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
- no unexpected binary files
- all ASF files have ASF headers
Thanks,
Xun Liu
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:54 PM Juan Pan wrote
Hi,
+1 binding, Thanks for clarification.
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP files are correct.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
--
Hi,
> Thanks for the thorough check, at compile time we have quite a lot of
> category X licensed dependencies, most JDBC drivers are not category A/B,
> all these dependencies are optional and need to be included by the user if
> he wants to connect to this specific database.
Optional dependanci
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the thorough check, at compile time we have quite a lot of
category X licensed dependencies, most JDBC drivers are not category A/B,
all these dependencies are optional and need to be included by the user if
he wants to connect to this specific database. We also have Transien
Hi,
+1 (binding) because of DISCLAIMER-WIP
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hash s fine
- WIP disclaimer exists
- no unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
There some issues:
- Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 content can’
HI,
It looks like at least one of those dependancies are Category X [1]
In particular this clause:
2.2 The Software shall not be sold, rented, subleased or otherwise distributed
in tangible or intangible form without EXASOL's consent. The use by and for
third parties (e.g., by outsourcing, applic
Thank you to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now
closed and it has passed.
The issues raised during the voting process have been added to Jira and
will be resolved by the next release [1][2]
Binding votes:
3: +1 votes
- François Papon
- Kevin Ratnasekera
- Zhenxu Ke
0:
Hi Hans,
I can get the Dave's concern. These licenses in Category x are always getting
IPMC's attention.
Since I have no clear idea on `fat client` （It needs these licenses?）, but if
no dependencies licensed in category x in this release and onwards, it is
suggested to consider removing t
Hi Dave,
That license has to be removed, no dependencies are LGPL my excuses for the
confusion on that part.
We used to have some that were included in the DISCLAIMER-WIP but they have
been removed between the previous release and now.
Cheers,
Hans
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:15, Dave Fisher wrote
Hi -
You need to avoid required dependencies that are licensed in Category X like
LGPL. Please review the Legal resolved page. [1]
If Hop is using the DISCLAIMER-WIP you can proceed, but if not then you’ll need
to remove those.
Regards,
Dave
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> O
Hi,
We are also planning on distributing a "fat client" that contains all
dependencies needed to run the application, so we listed all dependencies
in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/master/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/THIRD-PARTY.txt
For easy reference we added the license
Hi,
I am curious what the following licenses file existing in
`apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies` are for?
They are different from the licenses in the root directory, aren't they?
apache-hop-0.70-incubating/assemblies/static/src/main/resources/licenses/LICENSE-BSD2
apache-hop-0.70-
Hi, my +1, I’ve checked
- Sha sum is OK
- GPG signature verified.
- RC matches the git tag / branch.
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP files exist.
- Docs, release names include “Incubating”.
However the following issue is not a blocker of the release and can be fixed in
the following releasees,
Hi,
Yes, a mistake on my part: the 2 binding votes are Mentor/IPMC votes, we
have 3 PPMC votes in non-binding, Bart ,Matt and myself are PPMC. I put
them as non-binding as they do not count for an actual Incubator release.
Cheers,
Hans
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 16:55, Kris Calvin wrote:
> Sorry,
Sorry, there seem to be only two binding votes from the community vote. Are
some PPMC votes incorrectly calculated as non-binding?
Hans Van Akelyen 于2021年3月30日周二 下午10:43写道：
> Hi Incubator team,
>
> We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for
> release and would like y
Hi Incubator team,
We are proud to announce that we have a new release candidate ready for
release and would like your review and vote.
Build instructions can be found in the README included.
Hop community vote and result threads:
Vote:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r24f1435c891c11d87d20
17 matches
Mail list logo
