Thank you for point it out.
Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence
in LICENSE files.
As our test code locate in the Apache SVN, it should also be a part of our
artifacts.
I also see Apache
On 20 December 2011 02:30, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Thank you for point it out.
Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence
in LICENSE files.
No, not if it is not included in the
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
We do ship the junit jar in some of our release artifacts though, which is
why it's there
(It's also worth pointing out that
Thank you for the explanation. OK I will remove JUnit info from LN.
2011/12/20 Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
(1) Add MD5, SHA1 hashes and GPG signatures for all of
+1 ;)
2011/12/16 Devin Han devin...@apache.org
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the following issues found in RC3:
On 16 December 2011 08:47, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the following issues
Hi Devin,
I know I haven't been completely engaged in ODF Toolkit (incubating) lately. I
don't know if I have time to give this first release enough attention to vote
before the deadline.
Please consider extending the 72 hours to a full week.
Best Regards,
Dave
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:49 AM,
