Hi all,
The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.10.0-incubating-rc5 to be good
for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the
IPMC before a final official source-only release.
Vote result on dev@:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-predictionio-dev/20
Dear IPMC,
This is a friendly reminder that the vote is closing in 24 hours. Would
highly appreciate any feedback to this release candidate.
Regards,
Donald
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.10.0-incubating-rc5 to be good
I’ll second the ping and since I’m much less polite than Donald I’d like to add
that there are PRs and branches to be merged from a number of people that want
to contribute. A release would be a shot in the arm to our growing community.
Lots of good work is waiting on the vote.
+1 [non-binding]
I'll second the second. Please and thank you to "binding" eyes on this
release.
+1 [non-binding]
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> I’ll second the ping and since I’m much less polite than Donald I’d like
> to add that there are PRs and branches to be merged from a number of pe
Your website tells people to checkout your master branch to build from
source. This is a big no-no from an ASF standpoint. Snapshot builds
should only be for developer use.
CAn you double check your README files, missing headers.
John
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:01 PM Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi a
Hi John,
Thanks for pointing out these issues.
For the README issue, I have filed a ticket at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-39.
For the installation instructions, those are intended for pre-ASF releases.
We do not yet have any ASF releases so we can't tell people where to
download on
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked,
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binaries
- All source files have ASF headers (although there are a large number of file
that could possible have headers that don’t).
- Can compile from source
Very minor
Moving my vote from dev@
+1 binding
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked,
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
> - No unexpected binaries
> - All source files have ASF headers (although there a
What Donald said but also we use a slightly different process than most Apache
projects. Master is not a snapshot, we keep snapshots in the “develop” branch
until RCs start and they are the only contents of master ever—that is RCs or
releases. This process is not typical in Apache but I don’t th
To clarify the only thing you will ever find in master is a set of commits
tagged as an RC or release, never the intermediate changes as in typical
master/snapshots.
On Oct 7, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
What Donald said but also we use a slightly different process than most Apache
p
+1 binding
- Checked sums and signatures: ok
- Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE: present, properly formatted
- No binaries in the source release (except source image files)
- Compiled from source following the build instructions (8u102)
- Manually invoked Apache RAT using ./tests/.rat-excludes:
The vote passes with:
+1's (all binding)
Andrew Purtell
Justin Mclean
Suneel Marthi
No other votes.
Thanks everyone!
Regards,
Donald
12 matches
Mail list logo