Correction:
The vote has passed with a count of +3 binding votes.
Thanks,
Stepheny
On 2024/03/15 21:31:34 Stepheny Perez wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The vote has passed with a count of +1 binding votes.
>
> Binding +1 votes:
> - Julian Hyde
> - Xuanwo
> - PJ Fanning
>
> Other +1 votes:
> -
Hello everyone,
The vote has passed with a count of +1 binding votes.
Binding +1 votes:
- Julian Hyde
- Xuanwo
- PJ Fanning
Other +1 votes:
- Suyan
Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/d0225r6yh6q2hv036947oq0c57y0o919
Thank you,
Stepheny Perez
+1 (binding)
Thanks Stepheny for looking at the issues.
I verified the source tgzs including the checksums and signatures.
The license, notice and disclaimer files seem correct.
No unexpected binary files.
The ASF headers are on the main files.
On 2024/03/12 16:48:53 Stepheny Perez wrote:
> Hi
Hi P J,
I just removed the old RC's from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/
Thanks!
Stepheny
On 2024/03/08 22:16:17 PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Stepheny,
>
> Can you remove the old RCs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/ ?
>
> Is the signing key in
>
Thanks P J and sebb for your input! We will link to this file correctly moving
forward. In this case my signing key is listed here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/sdap/KEYS
Stepheny
On 2024/03/08 22:24:41 sebb wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:17, PJ Fanning wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> Did you use an automated tool to find these?
I’m using https://github.com/apache/skywalking-eyes
It’s very useful and easy to setup. Helping this will also help you 殺
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024, at 00:51, Riley Kuttruff wrote:
> Hi Xuanwo,
>
> Thank you for finding these missing license headers,
Hi Xuanwo,
Thank you for finding these missing license headers, I've opened a PR to address
this for our next release. Did you use an automated tool to find these? That
would be
helpful for evaluating and preparing future release candidates.
Thanks,
Riley
On 2024/03/11 02:45:50 Xuanwo wrote:
>
+1 non-binding
I checked:
[x] Download links are valid
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 5 09:24:47 2024 CST
gpg:using RSA key 2E8418801953621FAA322169D6F360887071C194
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: marginals needed: 3 completes needed: 1
+1 binding
There are some places to improve in next release, but this release looks good
overall.
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
gpg: Signature made Tue 05 Mar 2024 09:24:47 AM CST
gpg:using RSA key
Forwarding my vote from the dev@ list:
+1 (binding)
The points made by Sebb and PJ seem valid but they do not affect this vote.
Julian
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:17, PJ Fanning wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stepheny,
> >
> > Can you remove the old RCs from
>
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:17, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi Stepheny,
>
> Can you remove the old RCs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/ ?
>
> Is the signing key in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/sdap/KEYS ? With
> releases, you are supposed to point
Hi Stepheny,
Can you remove the old RCs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/ ?
Is the signing key in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/sdap/KEYS ? With
releases, you are supposed to point users to this file not provide a
link to
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version 1.2.0-rc4.
The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP
(incubating) version 1.2.0-rc4.
We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release.
SDAP community thread:
13 matches
Mail list logo
