Dear all,
I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
Sedona community vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra5f27cd5c9c3608205220c5d12a141c64681b7a5962785ce80fa73ec%40%3Cdev.sedona.apache.org%3E
Sedona community vote result thread:
https://lists.apache.org/t
+1 (binding) carry over from dev@
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:17 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
>
> Sedona community vote thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra5f27cd5c9c3608205220c5d12a141c64681b7a5962785ce80fa73e
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER (WIP) exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary file
- ASF files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source
I would be interesting to know where this file come from [1] and I'd be cu
The scala configuration file [1] appears to be a copy from [2] or its github
source at [3].
[1] ./examples/sql/src/test/resources/scalastyle_config.xml
[2] http://www.scalastyle.org/scalastyle_config.xml
[3]
https://github.com/scalastyle/scalastyle/blob/master/src/test/resources/config/scalastyl
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- signature OK
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER is there
- ASF headers on files
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
Thanks,
Regards
JB
> Le 22 mai 2021 à 22:17, Jia Yu a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
>
> Sedo
nofre,
fengji...@gmail.com |
| Subject | [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1 |
Dear all,
I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
Sedona community vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra5f27cd5c9c3608205220c5d12a141c64681b7a5962785ce80fa73
Mohamed Sarwat ,
> Netanel Malka ,
> Paweł Kociński ,
> Zongsi Zhang ,
> jinxuanw ,
> jbonofre ,
> fengji...@gmail.com
> Subject [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start a vote for Apache Sed
HI,
> 1. The reason why the BSD license has "2020 - 2021 Apache Sedona" is that
> we took the original index.js from that BSD project and modified it to
> support our system.
Generally modification to 3rd party code stay under the original license, and
you shouldn’t change the header, see [1]. A
Hi all,
Thanks for voting. 72 hours have passed and we have collected enough votes.
I will close this thread and announce the result.
Jia
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:42 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > 1. The reason why the BSD license has "2020 - 2021 Apache Sedona" is that
> > we took the o
Dear all,
Thank you for your help! The voting is now closed and it has passed.
Binding votes:
3: +1 votes
- Felix Cheung (carry from Sedona dev)
- Juan Pan
- Justin Mclean
- Jean-Baptiste Onofre
0 : 0 votes
0: -1 votes.
Non-binding
0: +1 votes
0 : 0 votes
0: -1 votes.
We will follow u
That should be fine since it’s Apache licensed and has no notice.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 23:13 Daniel Widdis wrote:
> The scala configuration file [1] appears to be a copy from [2] or its
> github source at [3].
>
> [1] ./examples/sql/src/test/resources/scalastyle_config.xml
> [2] http://www.sc
Hi,
> That should be fine since it’s Apache licensed and has no notice.
It’s fine, but best to mention it in the LICENSE file. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
12 matches
Mail list logo
