After a quick email exchange with our mentors, I'm going to publish the
0.61.0-incubating release as voted through, with the 0.7x release process to
begin shortly —the latter to address all licensing inconsistencies in .py
dependencies.
Announcement to follow.
-Steve
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote:
Would it be OK if we addressed all of the issues in that release? You've
identified them, which will make checking
On 9 February 2015 at 14:02:49, Justin Mclean
(jus...@classsoftware.commailto:jus...@classsoftware.com) wrote:
HI,
Would it be OK if we addressed all of the issues in that release? You've
identified them, which will make checking them easy. And as we plan to get
that out by the end of
HI,
Would it be OK if we addressed all of the issues in that release? You've
identified them, which will make checking them easy. And as we plan to get
that out by the end of the month, it won't be long before the latest
release is considered all lined up.
Up to you really as you have
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but it's -1 binding from me. Willing to change my vote if other incubator
members think these issues are OK for this release and/or corrective action is
taken for the next
On 9 February 2015 at 16:58:44, Marvin Humphrey
(mar...@rectangular.commailto:mar...@rectangular.com) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but it's -1 binding from me. Willing to change my vote if other
incubator members think these issues are OK for this release and/or corrective
action is taken for the next release.
All source files have headers and there no unexpected binaries but looks to be
be a few license and
I'm still looking for more votes here.
Here's my own:
+1 (binding)
On 3 February 2015 at 15:25:43, Steve Loughran
(ste...@hortonworks.commailto:ste...@hortonworks.com) wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release, with
+1 binding
On 02/03/2015 04:25 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release, with the same actual source as the
previous slider-0.60.0-incubating release. We've done this for downstream
projects;
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release, with the same actual source as the previous
slider-0.60.0-incubating release. We've done this for downstream projects;
once the release process is successfully reworked we'll use it in
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/03/2015 04:25 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release, with the same actual source as the previous
slider-0.60.0-incubating release. We've done this for downstream
11 matches
Mail list logo
