Voting is now closed. Thank you to everyone who voted.
This vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Totals:
+1:
Ted Dunning*
Matt Franklin*
Suresh Srivinas*
0:
-1:
(* indicates a binding vote)
- Taylor
On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> This is a call f
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> I would say that is the right approach, and
> that this vote should continue on.
>
> On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the clarification.
> >
> > After ch
I would say that is the right approach, and
that this vote should continue on.
On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:34 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Thank you very much for the clarification.
>
> After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those
> entries were made by
Hi Joseph,
Thank you very much for the clarification.
After checking the history of the NOTICE file [1], it turns out that those
entries were made by Nathan and a Yahoo! employee.
(I thought I had added Nathan to the file, but after checking the history,
realized I didn’t, so there is a commit
+1 (binding)
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote:
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1.
> This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
> binding, 3 n
It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them. But
if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
be asked to.
In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not. If you fix
this in HEAD that should be sufficient to conti
With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the
Apache v2 license.
Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License.
In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already
(the JavaScript files mentioned above), we
On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Hi sebb,
>
> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>
> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
file(s) involved.
> Thanks,
>
> Taylor
>
Hi sebb,
What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
Thanks,
Taylor
> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
> stay as 2013.
>
> As to th
If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
stay as 2013.
As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
provided with the files.
The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to
+1 (binding) from me.
Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
and can be addressed later.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49
+1
-Taylor
On Feb 13, 2014, at 2:00 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1.
> This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
> binding, 3 non-
Correction: “has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license” should read “has
now transitioned to the Apache v2 license”.
On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Thanks for the input!
>
> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and it
> includes si
Thanks for the input!
The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and it
includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but has
not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
If putting those attributi
On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>
> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version 0.9.1.
This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
Release Vote:
http://mail-archives.apa
16 matches
Mail list logo