On 15 February 2012 07:42, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Roman,
we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
point me to some written docs?
AFAIK, it would be
I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who
participated!
Jarcec
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
1.4.1-incubating.
We already have one IPMC vote on dev list
The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list vote):
Tom White
Patrick Hunt
Olivier Lamy (dev list vote)
Thanks for everyone who has reviewed and voted!
There was one note with slightly outdated year in one license that will be
addressed in next release. I will continue
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list vote):
Tom White
Patrick Hunt
Olivier Lamy (dev list vote)
Thanks for everyone who has reviewed and voted!
There was one note with slightly
Hi Roman,
we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
point me to some written docs?
We're currently appending -src postfix to stress out that it's only source
artifact whereas other artifacts also contains binaries.
Jarcec
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:27:35PM
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Roman,
we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
point me to some written docs?
AFAIK, it would be fair to say that Apache, in general, is all
about source releases. The
Thank you very much for your comment Roman. I didn't know that we're causing
you problems by using different naming convention than other hadoop related
projects.
I've filled JIRA SQOOP-439 to make this change happen.
Jarcec
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:42:20PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating.
We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for
additional two.
I'm resending this email again without original RE: prefix in subject to
stress that this is new vote.
Thanks,
Jarcec
+1. The release looks good. sig/xsum verify, rat looks good, licenses
of included third party code seem to be adhered to, I can build/test
successfully.
Patrick
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop,
On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
1.4.1-incubating.
We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for
additional two.
*** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 ***
+1 Unpacked and ran the unit tests successfully. Checksums and
signature are good. RAT passes. LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER look
ok.
Tom
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
Thank you for your feedback sir. If it's not an blocker, we will fix that in
next release.
Jarcec
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:41:00AM +, sebb wrote:
On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating.
We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for
additional two.
*** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 ***
Dev list vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc
The
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating.
We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for
additional two.
*** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 ***
Dev list vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc
The
14 matches
Mail list logo
