cc
Subject
11/10/2009 11:16 Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Elman wrote:
> It seems that Nick has some problems copying the distribution on
> people.apache.org (see http://tinyurl.com/yhpfp2v)
> I've already made changes to the site, but I don't want to upload it
> unless all the links work.
Ok... I wait until nex
It seems that Nick has some problems copying the distribution on
people.apache.org (see http://tinyurl.com/yhpfp2v)
I've already made changes to the site, but I don't want to upload it
unless all the links work.
2009/11/11 Niclas Hedhman
>
> What happen to this release?
>
> The links in this pos
What happen to this release?
The links in this post are no longer valid, and the Download page
http://incubator.apache.org/wink/downloads.html shows no sign of a
1.0-incubating release...
Cheers
Niclas
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo
wrote:
> The Wink community has voted on
good
> to me +1
>
>
> *ant elder *
>
> 11/09/2009 08:42 AM
> Please respond to
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> general@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [VOTE] Release Wi
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>
> Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
>
> In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink
> community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one
> more +1 to release as the vote h
9 08:42 cc
AM
Subject
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)
Please res
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the
Wink community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we
just need one more +1 to release as the vote has already
Simons ---11/09/2009 06:38:57 AM---+1
> from me!]Leo Simons ---11/09/2009 06:38:57 AM---+1 from me!
>
>
> *Leo Simons *
>
> 11/09/2009 06:38 AM
> Please respond to
> general@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> general@in
AM
Subject
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)
Please respond to
gene...@incubator
.apache
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo
wrote:
> The Wink community has voted on and approved the release
> of Wink 1.0 (RC-5). We would now like to request the
> approval of the Incubator PMC for this release.
>
> Details of the Wink community vote can be fou
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out
>>> a few things that probably ought
Subject
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0
Please respond to
gene...@incubator
.a
Hi Kevan,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out
>> a few things that probably ought to change. I didn't vote because I
>> don't want to go and revie
On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out
a few things that probably ought to change. I didn't vote because I
don't want to go and review all those very many binaries (or the build
process that creates them) and I'm n
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
> this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
> since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
> and see if other Apache proj
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
> this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
> since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
> and see if other
Hi Leo,
Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
and see if other Apache projects are doing things the right way, I
think we sho
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Bryant Luk wrote:
>> The source release has a LICENSE and a NOTICE file that indicates it
>> contains a bunch of stuff it does not actually contain. AFAICS it
>> should simply have a LICENSE that is just the Apache License and a
>> NOTICE file that has just our sta
Hi Leo,
Thanks for taking a look. Some comments in-line:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline...
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
> wrote:
>> The Wink community voted on and approved the release of
Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline...
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
wrote:
> The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We
> would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
> release.
>
> Podling vote t
10/26/2009 03:49 cc
AMwink-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject
Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0
P
+1. Congrats on 1.0.
Note the key used to sign the artifacts is not published to a public
key server so you may want to do that before the artifacts go live.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#public-key-not-found
...ant
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
wr
I missed the rc3 round of this release vote... Here's my laggard
mentor's +1. I don't see any other IPMC votes. So, this vote will
require a minimum of 2 additional IPMC votes.
--kevan
On Oct 23, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We
would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
Podling vote thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wink-...@incubator.apache.org/msg02060.html
The Maven staging area is at:
https://repositor
25 matches
Mail list logo
