Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-11 Thread Nicholas L Gallardo
cc Subject 11/10/2009 11:16 Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Elman wrote: > It seems that Nick has some problems copying the  distribution on > people.apache.org (see http://tinyurl.com/yhpfp2v) > I've already made changes to the site, but I don't want to upload it > unless all the links work. Ok... I wait until nex

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-11 Thread Michael Elman
It seems that Nick has some problems copying the  distribution on people.apache.org (see http://tinyurl.com/yhpfp2v) I've already made changes to the site, but I don't want to upload it unless all the links work. 2009/11/11 Niclas Hedhman > > What happen to this release? > > The links in this pos

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
What happen to this release? The links in this post are no longer valid, and the Download page http://incubator.apache.org/wink/downloads.html shows no sign of a 1.0-incubating release... Cheers Niclas On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote: > The Wink community has voted on

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread ant elder
good > to me +1 > > > *ant elder * > > 11/09/2009 08:42 AM > Please respond to > general@incubator.apache.org > > > To > > general@incubator.apache.org > cc > > > Subject > > Re: [VOTE] Release Wi

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread Leo Simons
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: > > Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated. > > In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink > community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one > more +1 to release as the vote h

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread Nicholas L Gallardo
9 08:42 cc AM Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5) Please res

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread Kevan Miller
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated. In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one more +1 to release as the vote has already

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread ant elder
Simons ---11/09/2009 06:38:57 AM---+1 > from me!]Leo Simons ---11/09/2009 06:38:57 AM---+1 from me! > > > *Leo Simons * > > 11/09/2009 06:38 AM > Please respond to > general@incubator.apache.org > > > To > > general@in

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread Nicholas L Gallardo
AM Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5) Please respond to gene...@incubator .apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 (RC-5)

2009-11-09 Thread Leo Simons
+1 from me! cheers, Leo On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote: > The Wink community has voted on and approved the release > of Wink 1.0 (RC-5).  We would now like to request the > approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. > > Details of the Wink community vote can be fou

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-30 Thread Bryant Luk
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Bryant Luk wrote: > Hi Kevan, > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> >> On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out >>> a few things that probably ought

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-30 Thread Nicholas L Gallardo
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 Please respond to gene...@incubator .a

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-30 Thread Bryant Luk
Hi Kevan, On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > > >> >> Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out >> a few things that probably ought to change. I didn't vote because I >> don't want to go and revie

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-30 Thread Kevan Miller
On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote: Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out a few things that probably ought to change. I didn't vote because I don't want to go and review all those very many binaries (or the build process that creates them) and I'm n

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-27 Thread Leo Simons
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > Thanks for the links.  One general comment I have is that I understand > this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo > since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look > and see if other Apache proj

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-27 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > Hi Leo, > > Thanks for the links.  One general comment I have is that I understand > this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo > since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look > and see if other

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-27 Thread Bryant Luk
Hi Leo, Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look and see if other Apache projects are doing things the right way, I think we sho

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-27 Thread Leo Simons
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: >> The source release has a LICENSE and a NOTICE file that indicates it >> contains a bunch of stuff it does not actually contain. AFAICS it >> should simply have a LICENSE that is just the Apache License and a >> NOTICE file that has just our sta

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-27 Thread Bryant Luk
Hi Leo, Thanks for taking a look. Some comments in-line: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Leo Simons wrote: > Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline... > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > wrote: >> The Wink community voted on and approved the release of

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-27 Thread Leo Simons
Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline... On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: > The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We > would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this > release. > > Podling vote t

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-26 Thread Nicholas L Gallardo
10/26/2009 03:49 cc AMwink-...@incubator.apache.org Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 P

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-26 Thread ant elder
+1. Congrats on 1.0. Note the key used to sign the artifacts is not published to a public key server so you may want to do that before the artifacts go live. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#public-key-not-found ...ant On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo wr

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-23 Thread Kevan Miller
I missed the rc3 round of this release vote... Here's my laggard mentor's +1. I don't see any other IPMC votes. So, this vote will require a minimum of 2 additional IPMC votes. --kevan On Oct 23, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: The Wink community voted on and approved the

[VOTE] Release Wink 1.0

2009-10-23 Thread Nicholas L Gallardo
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Podling vote thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/wink-...@incubator.apache.org/msg02060.html The Maven staging area is at: https://repositor