This vote is being cancelled because it was lapped by the next proposed
release candidate, (and because no one would vote for it).
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:40 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to
What about commons javaflow - you're releasing a binary jar for that
(its not been released by apache commons) and no source code from what
I can see:
http://incubator.markmail.org/message/wko4emwcwst5imto
If you're going to release that code then you should include the
source and IMO it would
+1 on what Niall said
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
What about commons javaflow - you're releasing a binary jar for that
(its not been released by apache commons) and no source code from what
I can see:
On 03/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent,
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:20 +0100, sebb wrote:
The reason for putting third-party licenses in lib/licenses was to
ease
maintenance, which in turn should help guarantee that this
information
is up-to-date and accurate. That still seems like a valid reason so
if
possible, I'd like to
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
+1 from me.
Matthieu
Cassandra is a massively
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
structured key-value store.
Podling vote thread:
