Thanks for the vote.
At this moment there is still one -1 vote made by Sebb, could you please
take a look at this release and change it to a +1 or indicate what is still
wrong?
Thanks!
2012/12/1 Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
||| Hi all,
|||
||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
Hi,
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
Done. The files in SVN are already a little bit further then the source in
the release. So there will probably be some small changes.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1408711
Hi,
-1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
(http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
61 Unknown Licenses.
I've taken a look at the reported files. They are all files that either
can't or shouldn't have a header, or files that have a different license.
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Furthermore, I have created a exclude file for RAT which excludes these
files. I still have to add it to SVN though..
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
Thanks,
Roman.
Hi,
Thanks for looking into the release!
-1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
(http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
61 Unknown Licenses.
Here's what I would like to suggest for cutting the new RC:
1. make it easy to run the RAT check by
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for looking into the release!
-1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
(http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
61 Unknown Licenses.
Here's what I would
||| Hi all,
|||
||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
||| files into the correct place etc.
|||
||| The source release file and
On 29 October 2012 10:23, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:26 , Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
Concerning the download, I've
Hi all,
taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy.
Sebb wrote:
The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license.
In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this
a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document
Hi,
In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document
format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X.
In the Celix case the file can/should be removed. But otherwise, it being a
file
Hi,
I agree that the download problem is not a blocker for the release.
Until it is fixed, I suggest adding a note to any vote e-mails to warn
reviewers about the problen.
Agreed.
Using wget, I was able to download the archive, sig and hashes.
The sig is OK.
The hashes have an unusual
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document
format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X.
In the Celix case the file can/should be
On 30 October 2012 20:18, Florian Holeczek flor...@holeczek.de wrote:
Hi all,
taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy.
Sebb wrote:
The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license.
In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:26 , Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
Concerning the download, I've changed the mime-type but that doesn't seem
to help. But since this is only the
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for your replies, I forgot some of the links, see my remarks inline.
Where is the release tag that corresponds with the release?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/celix/tags/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Where is the KEYS file?
I followed what seemed to be the default
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
files into the correct place etc.
This release has already been approved by our
+1 (non binding)
David
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time went into cleaning up sources,
On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
files
On 23 October 2012 16:43, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time
On Tuesday, 2012-10-23, sebb wrote:
[...]
There is something wrong when downloading using a browser.
I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same
(corrupted) file. However Opera is OK.
Downloaded it with Chrome and the file was compressed with gzip twice.
Same thing with the
On 23 October 2012 18:57, Matthias Friedrich m...@mafr.de wrote:
On Tuesday, 2012-10-23, sebb wrote:
[...]
There is something wrong when downloading using a browser.
I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same
(corrupted) file. However Opera is OK.
Downloaded it with
22 matches
Mail list logo
