Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software for the development
of software projects, including source control systems, issue tracking,
discussion, wiki, and other software project management
NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
On 13 February 2014 01:06, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
> second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software for the development
> of software projects, including so
Doh. I've fixed that in git just now. If its a blocker for this release, I can
go ahead and do new one, but obviously it'd be easier to continue with this one
if that's acceptable.
FYI we also got additional +1s on the dev list after I tallied. Jim Jagielski
and Roberto Galoppini.
On 2/13/14 5
The copyright date is not a showstopper.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
>
> Doh. I've fixed that in git just now. If its a blocker for this release, I
> can
> go ahead and do new one, but obviously it'd be easier to continue with this
> one
> if th
-1. files check out, but Allura doesn't work :(
checksums match, installation works, though not very well on ubuntu
minimal 13.10, dependencies cannot be met, I had to rewrite
requiements-common.txt to use Ming 0.4.3 instead of 0.4.2 which doesn't
exist, and libtidy was changed to 0.1.2 as 0.2.1 w
On 2/16/14 6:28 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> -1. files check out, but Allura doesn't work :(
>
> checksums match, installation works, though not very well on ubuntu
> minimal 13.10, dependencies cannot be met, I had to rewrite
> requiements-common.txt to use Ming 0.4.3 instead of 0.4.2 which doesn't
Daniel, have you had a chance to take a look at this again? I'm hoping we can
figure it out and flip your vote :)
On 2/17/14 6:54 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> On 2/16/14 6:28 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> -1. files check out, but Allura doesn't work :(
>>
>> checksums match, installation works, thoug
top-posting first, then a bit inside the original email;
I am +1 with regards to Allura 1.1.0 + changes, but still -1 on the
release candidate. If you were to spin up a new RC with the
proposed/fixed things, then I would be +1 towards that.
On 02/18/2014 12:54 AM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> On 2/16/1
Any other IPMC members able to vote on this? So far only binding +1s are from
me and Jim Jagielski.
On 2/12/14 8:06 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
> second release in the incubator. Allura is forge softw
NOTICE and LICENSE looks good.
Hash and Sig files are good.
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Dave Brondsema wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
> second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software
On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> At first I did not bother installing everything, as I assumed this
> wasn't necessary. I have since tried it with the full install, and it
> did not produce the same error then, but I still think the change to the
> plugin file is necessary for a
On 2/25/14 8:41 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> At first I did not bother installing everything, as I assumed this
>> wasn't necessary. I have since tried it with the full install, and it
>> did not produce the same error then, but I still think th
The vote passes with 3 +1s and 1 -1:
+1
--
Dave Brondsema
Jim Jagielski
Henry Saputra
-1
--
Daniel Gruno
Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/jv
Thanks for the votes and feedback on this release.
--
Dave Brondsema : d...@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com :
13 matches
Mail list logo
