Hi all,
After being open for more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating has passed with 3 binding +1s,
and no non-binding +1s, 0s or -1s.
Binding +1 votes:
- Alan Gates
- James Taylor
- John D. Ament
Thanks for voting and cheers to another Apache Tephra release!
-
John - that would be me. You wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
contents before release.
John
I did not read that as vote bu
Who feels I didn't change my vote? You didn't copy the whole thread so its
hard to tell.
John
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:08 PM James Taylor wrote:
> John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up
> whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> O
John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up
whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you.
Thanks,
James
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:30 PM, James Taylor
wrote:
> I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no?
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56
I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no?
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
> >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
> >> co
John - we'd appreciate your vote so that we can proceed with the release.
Thanks -Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> John - we will fix this as one of the first things after release, and will
> appreciate your feedback early-on, so that this is not an issue again
John - we will fix this as one of the first things after release, and will
appreciate your feedback early-on, so that this is not an issue again.
Thanks -Andreas
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
> releas
I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next
release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE
contents before release.
John
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:34 PM James Taylor
wrote:
> John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would
John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you be
willing to cast a vote?
Anyone else?
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran wrote:
> Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
> concerns/issues regarding the release candid
Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address
concerns/issues regarding the release candidate?
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Regarding your comment,
> >
> > > > I don't
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM Gokul Gunasekaran wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Regarding your comment,
>
> > > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't
> see
> > > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> > >
>
> The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distrib
Hi John,
Regarding your comment,
> > I don't see any of this text in your NOTICE file. Likewise, I don't see
> > where the contents of the NOTICE are coming from
> >
The LICENSE and NOTICE files that, are in the distribution, are present in
the tephra-distribution directory (named LICENSE_BINAR
John, is this a show stopper, or would it be ok if we address that Jira in
the next release?
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote:
> Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
>
> I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
Thanks so much for the explanation, John! Really appreciate it.
I have opened a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-265) to
fix this issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments
about the same.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Gokul,
>
>
Gokul,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:14 PM Gokul Gunasekaran wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
>
> - NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under tephra-distribution,
> contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we will
> create a JI
Good point, my bad. I have removed everything except for the current
release candidate now.
-Andreas
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:25 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Yes, my fault, looked at the wrong dist. However, you shouldn't include
> old releases in the dist area. Please clean them up.
>
> John
>
Yes, my fault, looked at the wrong dist. However, you shouldn't include
old releases in the dist area. Please clean them up.
John
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:16 PM Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> where do you see the LGPL? We had it, by mistake, in rc1, but it was
> removed for rc2.
>
> T
Hi John,
where do you see the LGPL? We had it, by mistake, in rc1, but it was
removed for rc2.
Thanks -Andreas
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
>
> TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified,
Hi John,
Thanks for the review of the release candidate.
- NOTICE file for Guice: The NOTICE_BINARY file under tephra-distribution,
contains the notice for Guice. Please let us how we can fix it and we will
create a JIRA to fix this issue. We had followed the example of including
libraries that h
They have removed the LGPL code. Not removing the license as well is an
oversight.
Alan.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
>
> TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
Hi,
I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise.
TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues identified, however it doesn't
seem to have been solved properly.
- The changes to the NOTICE file don't match the NOTICE file for Guice.
There is no need to declare the license usage for
Forwarding my +1 from the dev list.
Alan.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 03:56, James Taylor wrote:
>
> +1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote.
>
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a call for a vote on releasin
+1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
> release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
>
> The Apache Tephra community has vot
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
The Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tephra-dev/201709.mbox/%
3CCAN
24 matches
Mail list logo
