Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi, I know the vote is over but I checked the release - the source release is fine and I would of voted +1 (binding). Some of the thing that look like they need to be fixed: - source NOTICE contains wrong year - binary NOTICE contains wrong year - binary NOTICE incorrectly list ASF licenses.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi, > 3) I dont believe category B (for example the EPL dependencies in > binary license) dependencies belong in the license (binary or > otherwise). https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > It is my understanding those would be reflected in the notice. It’s unlikely that any

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

The vote is now closed and passes with 7 +1 votes and no +0 or -1 votes. Thanks to everyone who voted. James On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 PM, James Taylor wrote: > +1 (transferred from my dev vote) > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:49 AM, larry mccay

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (transferred from my dev vote) On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:49 AM, larry mccay wrote: > * built from source and ran all unit tests - over 1hr! > * checked LICENSE and NOTICE files > * Noticed things that others have already noted > * Noted that there is no CHANGES file in the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

* built from source and ran all unit tests - over 1hr! * checked LICENSE and NOTICE files * Noticed things that others have already noted * Noted that there is no CHANGES file in the release artifact - there is a CHANGES.txt in

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 binding. One odd thing I noticed was the existence of these directories in the source tarball, but since they don't contain any files they can be addressed in the next release: apache-tephra-0.14.0-incubating/${project.basedir}/ apache-tephra-0.14.0-incubating/${project.basedir}/src

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. Did a build in a fresh repo, looked over the LICENSE and NOTICE files, ran rat. Rat initially fails, but on further inspection all the files it's complaining about are the other license files. I believe there's a way to exclude these files from the rat run. In the future it would be good

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Verified source bundle signature and hashes and disclaimer. Verified build and distribution artifact (no live testing). Tephra release vote findings/improvements for consideration: 1) Use of md5 hashes worth removing in future releases 2) Copyright year in source and binary notice

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Verified md5 of the source tarball. Downloaded source, built successfully, ran a few unit tests. On 5/21/18, 9:02 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: +1 (binding) Things look good for the most part, a few things I noticed which can be fixed next release:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Things look good for the most part, a few things I noticed which can be fixed next release: * NOTICE needs an updated copyright year * `mvn apache-rat:check` fails on the below files apache-tephra-0.14.0-incubating/tephra-distribution/licenses/Aopa.PL

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

On 21 May 2018 at 23:51, James Taylor wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the seventh release of Tephra. The Tephra dev > community has voted on and approved a proposal to release

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the seventh release of Tephra. The Tephra dev community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1. PPMC Vote Call: