Hello PMC,
As a committer on the XAP Project, I would also vote +1 (non binding of
course) for moving the project from incubation to the attic. We have seen
little community develop around the project and have been making little/no
progress on the code lately.
Thanks for everyones help
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
XAP,
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/16/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least
4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
+1. I see little chance of XAP being resurrected at this point.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Craig
On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
with XAP,
I am
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
+1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
+1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Yoav Shapira yo...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
+1.
Eddie
On Feb 16, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
henn...@apache.org wrote:
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached,
+1
--kevan
On Feb 16, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at
least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing
with XAP,
I am
+1.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
On 2/16/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as
19 matches
Mail list logo
