+1
On Jan 10, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project,
which bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to acce
Hi,
It seems to me like this vote is now closed, with a positive outcome,
no further action in about a week. Unless I missed something, will
the originator of the vote please send out a [VOTE][RESULT] email with
a tally? ;)
Yoav
On 1/11/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/11/06, J
On 1/11/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other question to help narrow the project's scope a little: Is the
> 'search server' written entirely from scratch or is it using servlets or
> some other Java HTTP container?
Solr is currently implemented as a webapp for a servlet con
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:21:49AM -0800, Doug Cutting wrote:
> I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
>
> Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
> bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
>
> The Lucene PMC would b
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:30:59AM -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> That's a good policy, Brian.
Not really. Votes like this are about whether the proposal conforms to our
standards and consequently executing the Incubator PMC's oversight
responsibilities - that is, everything about the proposal is i
ST
Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project,
which
bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accep
Otis
- Original Message
From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:49 PM EST
Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this lis
Hi,
+1 from me.
Yoav
On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is as clear as day: +1.
>
> Otis
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:49 PM EST
Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into th
On 1/10/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
> and get them down either as comitters and/or
> Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
> them from the proposal?
I didn't list any mentors myself on the proposal beca
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > (a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
> > and get them down either as comitters and/or
> > Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
> > them from the proposal?
> None whatsoever. If their statements of willingness
--On January 10, 2006 3:11:28 PM -0500 Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I mentioned I'd be interested, I still am. I'd like to be a committer
(I think I am automatically, at least through the incubation period,
by virtue of being on the Incubator PMC), but it seemed to me like
At
Hi,
I mentioned I'd be interested, I still am. I'd like to be a committer
(I think I am automatically, at least through the incubation period,
by virtue of being on the Incubator PMC), but it seemed to me like
having the entire Lucene PMC group as mentors was enough, so I didn't
add myself as a me
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
None whatsoever. If their statements of willingness to help meant that
they'd like to be
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I believe there were a few people from outside the Lucene PMC who
volunteered (Paul Querna did, and perhaps some others), it seems
useful to get people from other parts of the ASF involved, just to
encourage cross pollination of ideas.
That would be great. I did not under
Doug,
I saw a number of ASF folks expressing interesting in participating. My
quick take is that:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
(b) the Lucen
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I don't see Erik listed on the proposal as a mentor. -- justin
I just added him.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/10/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
> > interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
>
> Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we need more?
I believe th
--On January 10, 2006 11:51:33 AM -0800 Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we nee
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Doug, you can only make this statement with a vote by the Lucene PMC.
The Lucene PMC has already voted to sponsor this podling. My
understanding is that the Incubator PMC must also vote to accept the
podling. Is that not correct?
Doug
-
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we need more?
Doug
Doug Cutting wrote:
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accept Solr as a Lucene sub-project
once it graduates from the incubator.
Doug, you can only make this statement with a vote by the Lucene PMC. I'd
suggest that the Lucene PMC vote on incubating the proposal. In doing so,
the Lucene proje
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:21:49AM -0800, Doug Cutting wrote:
> I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
>
> Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
> bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
>
> The Lucene PMC would b
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accept Solr as a Lucene sub-project
once it graduates from t
24 matches
Mail list logo
