On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
A list of people on the Incubator PMC is here:
http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
Ok, thanks for the hint. That settles it:
- We have three binding +1 votes: Robert, Stefan, Kevan
- We also have two non-binding +1 votes:
with this?
are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
The only problem pointed out so far was the invalid year in the copyright.
See
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat-project-0.6rc3-p22608341.html
darn - i thought i'd checked that :-/
not particularly
Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
where are we with this?
are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
The only problem pointed out so far was the invalid year in the
copyright. See
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, that brings up the question whether these three votes are sufficient.
I can add +1, with the proviso that the (C) year must be corrected for
the next release.
I don't know if my +1 counts though.
where are we with this?
are we cutting another release candidate or shall i take a look this one?
- robert
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2009-03-19, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository,
/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat-project-0.6rc3-p22608341.html
I do not know, what the implications are so far. Apart from that, we
have only two positive votes and I do not know whether they are
sufficient.
Jochen
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish
pointed out so far was the invalid year in the copyright. See
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--VOTE--apache-rat-project-0.6rc3-p22608341.html
darn - i thought i'd checked that :-/
not particularly happy to ship with it but probably not a show stopper
I do not know, what the implications are so far
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller
kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build
On 2009-03-19, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.6/
The SVN tag is at
On 19/03/2009, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have prepared a new staging repository, which you can find on
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/rat-51670640d59ff2/
The proposed binary and source files are in the subdirectory
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of the
jars are not being generated with all of the required LICENSE, NOTICE,
DISCLAIMER files. However, looks like your generated binaries are
correct. On my system:
apache-rat/target/apache-rat-0.6.jar does not
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of the jars
are not being generated with all of the required LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER
files. However, looks like your generated binaries are
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jochen,
In addition to the copyright date, when I build locally, some of the jars
are not being generated with all of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
