Re: Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

2007-04-06 Thread Ted Husted
On 4/5/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i've always assumed that every mentor needed to be a member but IMHO we should really consider what the rule should be and then vote to amend the policy appropriately. At one time, there was only one mentor, and now there are three, an

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
The vote passes with 5 binding +1, 3 non-binding +1 an 1 +0 votes. The binding votes were: +1 Martin van den Bemt +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 Ted Husted +1 Carsten Ziegeler The non-binding votes were: +1 Mike Kienenberger +1 Henning Schmiedehausen (mentor) +1 Mart

Re: Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

2007-04-06 Thread Alex Karasulu
On 4/5/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/5/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, > > incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page: > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html > > [...] > Acceptance By

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 Carsten Omar Tazi wrote: > Hi, > > Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF > contribution (see proposal below). > > This proposal is for the donation of a rich component library for the > JavaServer Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundation. The live

Re: Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

2007-04-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/5/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html [...] Acceptance By Incubator [...] * the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide t

Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

2007-04-05 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Well, incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html [...] Acceptance By Incubator [...] * the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide the Candidate through the Incubation Process. At least one nomin

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-05 Thread Ted Husted
+1 (binding) I'm impressed by both the quantity and quality of volunteers named in this proposal, and I expect that a robust, vibrant community will be the end result. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 4/3/07, Omar Tazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF contribution (see proposal below) +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-04 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 4/3/07, Omar Tazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF contribution (see proposal below). [...] Please cast your votes. +1 BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscrib

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
back to the votes: +1 (non-binding). regards, Martin On 4/4/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey guys, can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread? This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track for those that wanna vote. Feel free to do ;-)

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hey guys, can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread? This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track for those that wanna vote. Feel free to do ;-) CU in Amsterdam ;) -Matthias On 4/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, N

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-04 Thread Craig L Russell
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote: On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor. Actually, according to Incubator policy [1] it's the other way around. "Upon acce

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-04 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote: > On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor. > > Actually, according to Incubator policy [1] it's the other way around. > "Upon acceptance by the Incubator PMC, the Podling's Mentor

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-04 Thread Craig L Russell
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process. +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand, if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I

Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)]

2007-04-04 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process. > > +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand, > if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process. > > +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand, > if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?) AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Martin van den Bemt
+1 (binding) Mvgr, Martin Omar Tazi wrote: > Hi, > > Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF > contribution (see proposal below). > > This proposal is for the donation of a rich component library for the > JavaServer Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundati

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 4/3/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process. +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand, if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?) As an ASF Member, you can ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] dir

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
typo On 4/3/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think a member has a binding vote here, not sure. has => hasn't A member can be (will be) added to inc pmc (at least when a member is a mentor, like you) .M On 4/3/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I think a member has a binding vote here, not sure. A member can be (will be) added to inc pmc (at least when a member is a mentor, like you) .M On 4/3/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process. +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incuba

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process. +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand, if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?) Best regards Henning On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 16:15 -0700, Omar Tazi wrote: > Hi, > > Based o

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/2/07, Omar Tazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF contribution (see proposal below). This proposal is for the donation of a rich component library for the JavaServer Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundation. The live v

Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-03 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 07:15, Omar Tazi wrote: > Please cast your votes. +0, binding. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug ---

[Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)

2007-04-02 Thread Omar Tazi
Hi, Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF contribution (see proposal below). This proposal is for the donation of a rich component library for the JavaServer Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundation. The live version of the proposal is available at: