Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-06 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
As is mine, I believe. Otis - Original Message From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 8:18:36 AM Subject: Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2 I didn't specify as such with my vote, but I believ

RE: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-04 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I still have a concern about the notification requirement on the OASIS IP FAQ, but that can be resolved during Incubation. And, yes, we've seen the vote result. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-04 Thread Leo Simons
On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:17 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: issues addressed in this release: 1. updated proposal included 2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson 3. OASIS issue addressed Thanks Ian. +1, Leo [ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this pr

Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-03 Thread Ian Holsman
Cool. and Ken's makes 5 binding votes. On 03/10/2006, at 10:18 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: I didn't specify as such with my vote, but I believe my +1 was binding as well. Erik On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: On 03/10/2006, at 7:32 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Oct 0

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-03 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling (also binding. and late.) - -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -BEGIN PGP

Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-03 Thread Erik Hatcher
I didn't specify as such with my vote, but I believe my +1 was binding as well. Erik On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: On 03/10/2006, at 7:32 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:09:24PM +1000, Ian Holsman wrote: I hope I get this part of process correc

Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-03 Thread Ian Holsman
On 03/10/2006, at 7:32 PM, Mads Toftum wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:09:24PM +1000, Ian Holsman wrote: I hope I get this part of process correct. a reference to the results of the vote (so as to provide an audit trail for the records) Vote Tally: 3 binding votes (all +1) 5 non binding vo

Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-03 Thread Mads Toftum
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:09:24PM +1000, Ian Holsman wrote: > I hope I get this part of process correct. > > a reference to the results of the vote (so as to provide an audit > trail for the records) > > Vote Tally: > 3 binding votes (all +1) > 5 non binding votes (all +1) > Could you please

[RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-02 Thread Ian Holsman
I hope I get this part of process correct. a reference to the results of the vote (so as to provide an audit trail for the records) Vote Tally: 3 binding votes (all +1) 5 non binding votes (all +1) a reference to the Candidate's proposal can be found here: http:// wiki.apache.org/incubator

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-10-01 Thread Sam Ruby
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling (binding) - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 9/27/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson thanks - much better. but i don't see at all in terms of explaining it to laypersons. a project that cannot explain itself clearly in a paragraph doesn't understand itself. [X] +1 Accept U

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-28 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 9/26/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: As before. -- justin

RE: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-27 Thread Hervé Azoulay
d a lot of projects can build benefits on it. Hervé -Original Message- From: Ian Holsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 27 septembre 2006 01:18 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2 issues addressed in this release: 1. updated proposal

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-27 Thread Eric Nyberg
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: -ehn Ian Holsman wrote: issues addressed in this release: 1. updated proposal included 2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson 3. OASIS issue addressed [ ] +1 Accept

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-27 Thread Erik Hatcher
+1 On Sep 26, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: issues addressed in this release: 1. updated proposal included 2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson 3. OASIS issue addressed [ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the fol

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-26 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 9/26/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: +1 (non binding) -Yonik - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-26 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: Otis - Original Message From: Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:17:37 PM Subject: [Vote] acc

[Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2

2006-09-26 Thread Ian Holsman
issues addressed in this release: 1. updated proposal included 2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson 3. OASIS issue addressed [ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: 8<---Proposal--8<--