On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:30:52PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> HmmmSorry but this is the first time I've carefully looked at the
> ReleaseGuide, otherwise if I saw it back when you threw it up on the wiki,
> I'd probably have debated this convention for *artifact names* (note this
; Marvin suggests.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>> Cc: "lucy-...@incubator.apache.org" ;
>> "lucy-u...@incubator.apache.org"
>>
v@lucy as
Marvin suggests.
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc: "lucy-...@incubator.apache.org" ;
>"lucy-u...@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 9:30:52 PM
Hi Marvin,
On May 20, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Hi, Chris, thanks for expediting.
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:18:37PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-lucy-0.1-incubating/rc1/
>
> The artifacts here do not follow the version
Hi, Chris, thanks for expediting.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:18:37PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-lucy-0.1-incubating/rc1/
The artifacts here do not follow the version naming convention that is used by
the source code of X.Y.Z, and that the Re
t;> To: "lucy-...@incubator.apache.org"
>> Cc: "lucy-u...@incubator.apache.org" ;
>> "general@incubator.apache.org"
>> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 5:18:37 PM
>> Subject: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1
>>
>> Hi F
c: "lucy-u...@incubator.apache.org" ;
>"general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 5:18:37 PM
> Subject: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy 0.1.0-incubating release candidate #1
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am proud to announce the first candidate for the Apac
