William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
sebb wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html was just recently revised by
Roy Fielding (ASF Director and founding officer) based on some nonsense
back-channel complaints, and might be worth integrating into incubator
docs.
Would it not be better to
On 28 November 2011 19:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it
On 11/29/2011 9:52 AM, sebb wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html was just recently revised by
Roy Fielding (ASF Director and founding officer) based on some nonsense
back-channel complaints, and might be worth integrating into incubator
docs.
Would it not be better to integrate the
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/29/2011 9:52 AM, sebb wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html was just recently revised by
Roy Fielding (ASF Director and founding officer) based on some nonsense
back-channel complaints, and might
On 11/29/2011 2:14 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I've been wondering whether F2F meetups (bootcamps) for the incubator
might be a way forward
Every retreat I've attended - which translates to those in Wicklow -
has included some level of incubator orientation, and some participation
by a
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/29/2011 2:14 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I've been wondering whether F2F meetups (bootcamps) for the incubator
might be a way forward
Every retreat I've attended - which translates to those in
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 29, 2011 10:10 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/29/2011 2:14 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I've
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1 vote.
And that isn't correct, as Joe was kind enough to point
On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1
On 11/28/2011 3:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
No - nobody can veto a release. But you also can't slip in a vetoed patch
and say this is a release vote, its not subject to veto. Well, as I had
hinted, the RM can withdraw a vote, which
10 matches
Mail list logo
