+1
Cheers
Niclas
On 5/3/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
Thanks,
Brett
(OpenEJB Mentor)
Establish
+1 -- good luck out in the World!
Eddie
On 5/4/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Cheers
Niclas
On 5/3/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast
On May 4, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
+1 -- good luck out in the World!
The project started Dec 1999, but I know what you mean :) Thanks for
the good wishes, we're pretty excited too!
-David
Eddie
On 5/4/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Cheers
Niclas
On
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
Thanks,
Brett
(OpenEJB Mentor)
Establish Apache OpenEJB Project
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it
Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
+1
Bill
-
To unsubscribe,
+1 from me
Paul
On 5/3/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
+1
Bill
+1
However, IFF (if and only if, for those not posessing a math or logic
background), it isn't too much trouble, could you recast it in the form of
the revised template?
Mind you, that's really an issue for the Board, so it doesn't require a
revote here if the non-template text remains the same,
On 5/3/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
+1
- robert
recast IFF it isn't too much trouble or +1 IFF we recast? :D
Yes, I'll adjust to the new template before submitting to the board,
should the vote pass.
- Brett
On 03/05/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
However, IFF (if and only if, for those not posessing a math or logic
+1
Craig
On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
Thanks,
Brett
(OpenEJB Mentor)
Establish Apache
Hi,
On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
+1, and good luck.
I also want to add that I'm impressed
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 5/3/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend
+1
On 5/3/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
Thanks,
Brett
(OpenEJB Mentor)
Establish Apache OpenEJB
Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
+1
best wishes,
-jean
-
On May 3, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+1
However, IFF (if and only if, for those not posessing a math or
logic
background), it isn't too much trouble, could you recast it in the
form of
the revised template?
Mind you, that's really an issue for the Board, so it doesn't
+1 from me
On 5/3/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me
Paul
On 5/3/07, Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
Please cast your
16 matches
Mail list logo
