Re: A few questions about a potential entry into the incubator

2010-08-04 Thread Ross Gardler
Thanks for the responses. I'm moving forwards with this now. Ross On 27/07/2010 11:11, Ross Gardler wrote: I'm currently working with the community behind a large and established codebase that wants to enter the ASF Incubator. It is likely to be a while before we have the legal stuff sorted

A few questions about a potential entry into the incubator

2010-07-27 Thread Ross Gardler
I'm currently working with the community behind a large and established codebase that wants to enter the ASF Incubator. It is likely to be a while before we have the legal stuff sorted out but all indications are that it will be sorted. I do, however, have a few questions from the team that

Re: A few questions about a potential entry into the incubator

2010-07-27 Thread Marcel Offermans
On 27 Jul 2010, at 12:11 , Ross Gardler wrote: Are there any problems bringing these modules into the podling, managing them under the same community but each having separate release cycles. Apache Felix is one example of a project that consists of many modules, each with their own release

Re: A few questions about a potential entry into the incubator

2010-07-27 Thread Upayavira
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:11 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: I'm currently working with the community behind a large and established codebase that wants to enter the ASF Incubator. It is likely to be a while before we have the legal stuff sorted out but all indications are that it will be

Re: A few questions about a potential entry into the incubator

2010-07-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote: Finally, they have a large number of users and thus changing their java package names to org.apache.* will create considerable problems for them. They are happy with the package names but want to do it in a managed way